But we don't need more babies. John Gibson admits as much. Though he then says that the Hispanics can't keep providing enough of them. He doesn't offer any support for this idea.
Also, the reason Europe needs more babies is because they have exactly the huge government entitlement programs against which John Gibson is thoroughly opposed. So, the need for more babies to perpetuate next-generation-funded entitlements is only a sensible conclusion if you support the next-generation-funded entitlements. The lack of babies will bring about the end of the entitlements that Gibson already opposes.
Further, the true demographic change that is stressing American next-generation entitlement programs is not a falling birth rate (for we are still popping them out at more than replacement levels, even among the gringos) but an extending lifespan. If John Gibson really wants to save the entitlement programs that he so strongly opposes then rather than unprotected sex he should be advocting a Logan's Run policy (though perhaps at an age that would allow his continued existence).
|