|
I suppose it depends on the overall figures rather than percentages and also what has been done thus far. I haven't done any research, so the following is hypothetical.
Let's say that most of the funding went to big cities originally to do things like put up concrete barriers so that car bombs couldn't drive into a building. Well, once that is done, the funding doesn't need to be there to do that and can be diverted elsewhere.
I would guess that the large portions of the funding went to large population centers to do that kind of stuff first. Once improvements like that are done, the funding then moves to smaller population centers to do similar facility improvements that only need to be done once.
Just a thought on why it may be happening. It may not be the reason, but it is plausible and logical.
|