View Single Post
Old 02-02-2005, 10:55 AM   #19
scaeagles
I LIKE!
 
scaeagles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
scaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of coolscaeagles is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
I do not want to live in an unhealthy nation. Helping to provide for the nation's health is in my best interest.
To what extreme does this go to, though? I realize you are not saying such a thing, and I am simply playing devil's advocate, but why not completely ban tobacco? Or food with a certain fat content? Or transfatty acids? Or any number of things that make us unhealthy.

So many ailments are completely avoidable. Should the government ensure that circumstances that can contribute to those situations are eliminated? No. I do not believe, then, that I should be held in anyway responsible, nor should the government be held responsible, for choices made that lead to health problems.

There are, of course, situations which are not a matter of choice. I am much more sympathetic to those, as i am sure everyone is.

I have an acquiantance who had a child with some health problems and the benefits at his job were not adequate. So he took a second full time job at - gasp - Walmart. Did it strictly for the health program he was able to get. This was 18 months or so ago, and I am not sure of the status of things.

Tough times suck. Big time. But I believe that there are outs that people do not consider because they are not easy enough. For every one of those, there are others who have no alternative but to have government assistance, and I am all for it.
scaeagles is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote