|
I didn't attack the way it was written. If your point is that people are claiming this leak will bring America down then your point is irrelevant since nobody has said that. When question you changed it to claiming that people were saying it would compromrise the war on terrorism. This is much more valid, but when questioned again you changed it back.
Therefore, since I assume you don't intend to be irrelevant that you haven't quite said what you meant. But I stand corrected.
Apparently you equate someone saying that something is bad with saying it is maximally destructive. I do think I understand your posts about the administration. You are so irrationally vitriolic that it doesn't matter to you if your claims and statements about the administratin make any sense so long as they fulfill your belief that they are essentially pure evil and deception. That this view then enables you to do exactly that which you claim to hate so much in them (manipulation and ignoring of facts to serve predetermined ends) and bristle at any suggestion that you provide support for the claims you make. Your discussion on issues related to the president generally boil down to "I don't care about facts! He's a doo doo head!"
In this thread you have simultaneously said that the leak is no big deal because it is common knowledge and practice. You have also said it is a huge deal that should get Bush imeached. And then you criticized people for saying that this leak could bring down America, which nobody has said and is the point I took issue with. It is very easy to "win" a debate when you get to make up what the other side says.
|