View Single Post
Old 08-11-2006, 05:49 PM   #216
Tramspotter
Show me on the bear.
 
Tramspotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 445
Tramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digs
Send a message via AIM to Tramspotter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
I don't disagree that there are a great majority who share a liberal viewpoint, but saying, "so anything that is said that could possibly be deemed as supportive of what is seen as an evil republican regime will be struck down with furious anger", you're implicitly saying, "I'm going to ignore any response because it's just the liberal reaction." That's the dismissive bit.
How is it iplicit?

He is actualy the one claiming conservitve opinions are being dismissed out of hand. You dodge this point why? Because of it's tone?

Why then so agrieved by this even to the point of turning it around to a dismissal of other well crafted enlightened folk dismissals... Are you hard pressed to find supporting evidence that this is not the case? Perhaps even guilty of unleshing various degrees of said furious anger, or do you actualy belive it has no point in open debate, or do you so savor the golden oppertunity to drive home a counterpoint point without it being waived off by the "pig headed" conservitive originator.

If responce matters not and you wan't unvarnished opinion as you claim in this post meaning she should :my words: (grow a pair) and "just state an opinion" as you advise below. Should not any counter arguments be weighted the same?

They seem counter-intuitive advice wise, perhaps becuase Eric dosen't give a mad Fvck and Neph certainly does I would ask is your advice is tailored to each?

Either way as far as Me Vs. Them it is a Feeling/Belief that should not be argued I'm sure the Us (Enlightenened/world citizen/Liberal) Vs. them (neocon/hick) is a living breathing feeling/belief of a great majority who post here and feel unheard by the majority. Realize that sometimes it's a struggle for us thinking non-backwoods hicks on the otherside to not dissmiss unfounded opinions or inside jokes as clasic moonbat fare. Even when you find them chuckleworthy they are all not worthy of a hauty chinstroking "interesting"

I thought you didn't enjoy preaching to the quire and this post struck me off hand as a blatant STFU disenter thread. When you are the fishbowl gardian it is something to check against. Especialy when complaining about the larger pond being chalk full with slow swimmers that disagree are stupid and need to listen to reason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
Like I said in my repsonse to Neph above, just state you're opinion. No need to qualify it. If people agree, they'll let you know. If people disagree, they'll let you know. Why the need to turn it into "me" vs. "them"?

Bah, I've already given this too much effort. Go change your pants.
Bah, me too. Fvcking hippies give me a headache (although I listen to worse on the inter-office mail-server)
Tramspotter is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote