|
Frogberto, I am finding your science rants interesting ... but they are indeed, in compendum, amounting to a constant challenging of people's expressed beliefs. Counterpoint is one thing, but it's almost approaching beratement at this point.
While I cannot direct the course of discussion, my opinion is also that it would be nice to discuss the whys of folks' godish beliefs, the nature of them, how they arose, what experiences reinforce them or challenge them, etc. ... and to have less of the anti-god stance of science that has been presented so exhaustively and eloquently.
just a suggestion.
|