Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight
Using nationalistic ferver as a justification for the consolidation of government and military power to a single person . . . .
|
This is certainly an interesting separation of powers question. Nonetheless, I'm always struck by how the argument in favor of unchecked presidential power often dwarfs the discussion about the wisdom of what each side is advocating. I put it down to masculine fantasy. I've talked to a few decent conservative fellows on the subject, and their eyes get all glowy, one leg starts bouncing up and down, etc. It's as if they're imagining themselves as president, or as Hulk Hogan storming out from the dressing room to clean house, or Arnold/Sly/Chuck in the movies, or an all-powerful D & D character.
If the left ever has occasion to argue for an all-powerful executive, I imagine the image will be "rock star god," as no shortage of people viewed Clinton.