As I've said before, I'm not much for the arbitrary age-line of 18, but I suppose it has to be
somewhere.
But the link Neph has to the Drudge Report's take on the former page's age says, and I quote ...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Drudge
A network source explains, messages with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday.
|
So, um, I don't see how Foley squirms out of it. Perhaps that really bad incident of I.M sex during a house vote was post-18 (so sinfully remincent of the under-desk BJs of one former PotUS) ... but there were plenty more emails and IMs and other pages. And a reputation for years. And warnings given by Foley's chief of staff to Hastert's chief of staff over 2 years ago, and warnings from other Congressmen directly to Hastert over a year ago.
What's your problem Neph? Are you purposefully wearing blinders?
oh. yeah.
sometimes i forget.