Quote:
|
Originally Posted by innerSpaceman
As I've said before, I'm not much for the arbitrary age-line of 18, but I suppose it has to be somewhere.
But the link Neph has to the Drudge Report's take on the former page's age says, and I quote ...
So, um, I don't see how Foley squirms out of it. Perhaps that really bad incident of I.M sex during a house vote was post-18 (so sinfully remincent of the under-desk BJs of one former PotUS) ... but there were plenty more emails and IMs and other pages. And a reputation for years. And warnings given by Foley's chief of staff to Hastert's chief of staff over 2 years ago, and warnings from other Congressmen directly to Hastert over a year ago.
What's your problem Neph? Are you purposefully wearing blinders?
oh. yeah.
sometimes i forget.
|
Nope just missed the line....
Take the blinders off your own party side before launching at me...thanks
I have said he should be held responsible for anything he did wrong-never said he would SQUIRM out of anything- but this attitude that says the Dems knew nothing is the same as sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "la la la- I can't hear you!"
Sad.