|
I don't see where I've changed the subject in the least. I'm the one who started this particluar point in this thread because I believe there was a republican cover up. All I did was say that if the dems knew and covered it as well to use politically then they are as despicable in this instance as the republicans hiding it to protect a seat. Honestly, I think they are equivalent because we are talking about holding onto info about a predator in their midst. Playing politics with it is playing politics with it regardless of the motive.
I don't think anyone should sit on info like this. For whatever reason. It's beyond sickening.
From what you are saying, WB, you support the dirtiest of dirty politics if the dirty politics are on your side. You would want to allow a predator to stay in office to use that info at a more opportune time rather than exposing the predator when you learned of it? That's something I can't subscribe to.
|