Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scaeagles
I don't see where I've changed the subject in the least. I'm the one who started this particluar point in this thread because I believe there was a republican cover up. All I did was say that if the dems knew and covered it as well to use politically then they are as despicable in this instance as the republicans hiding it to protect a seat. Honestly, I think they are equivalent because we are talking about holding onto info about a predator in their midst. Playing politics with it is playing politics with it regardless of the motive.
I don't think anyone should sit on info like this. For whatever reason. It's beyond sickening.
|
I don't really have a problem with what you are saying here. BUT, you are the one that suggested that the democrats might have been involved. Right now, all evidence suggests a republican cover-up. There is nothing remotely fact-based that supports the idea of an "October Surprise" and the only reason it is even a part of the discussion is because of a lame attempt by some on the right recently to muddy the waters with baseless speculation for the purposes of taking the focus off the real issue.
So, I suppose it is ok, for discussion purposes, to consider the hypothetical, as long as we remember that it is only hypothetical, and has no basis in fact, whatsoever.