![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#1 | |
L'Hédoniste
|
The Original in Art
This quote got me thinking:
Quote:
And yet there are plenty of art forms that seem to lack an "original." I think of musical composers, who create an original score - but each performance becomes a sort of attempt to achieve the artistic vision. Sometimes, that vision becomes a collaboration between compose, conducter, and musicians. I'm also a huge fan of performance art, which similarly seemns to lack a definitive version though there may be many instances visioning the concept. So why the need for an original? Do even painting ever capture the image the artist first envisioned in his mind? Do we just consider this the best attempt, with the other artifacts of the original yieling clues to what the artist was really after - the addition of sand for texture to contrast the smothness of the paint, the layers betraying previous failed attempts at bringing the image to life, or the brush strokes hinting at the movement inherent in the static image? Or is the original just a piece of sympathetic magic, a reliquary of the creative process whose possession might bestow us with similar creative or aesthetic powers? Indeed just what is it we hope to grasp with an original work of art that a reproduction will not yield?
__________________
I would believe only in a God that knows how to Dance. Friedrich Nietzsche ![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|