|  | €uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. | 
| 
 |  | |||||||
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes | 
|  04-29-2006, 10:39 AM | #1 | |
| Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes 
					Posts: 18,500
				            | 
				
				Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - What could have been
			 While sitting at my computer vegetating, I was reading through Hugh Laurie's biography on IMDb and saw this: Quote: 
 
				__________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln | |
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  04-29-2006, 11:27 AM | #2 | 
| Double Agent Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Back East 
					Posts: 2,071
				            | Jim Carrey?  Count me out of the theater for this hypothetical film. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  04-29-2006, 11:29 AM | #3 | 
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: East Bay Area, CA 
					Posts: 3,156
				            | Hugh Laurie doesn't strike me as being pathetic enough to play Dent. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  04-29-2006, 07:11 PM | #4 | 
| Nevermind | Actually, based on some of his Black Adder work, I'd say he would have been pretty perfect.  I didn't like the Arthur they wound up with at all- the only casting they got right was Rickman as Marvin. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  04-29-2006, 10:35 PM | #5 | 
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2005 
					Posts: 231
				    | I liked the guy they cast as Arthur, but I would have hated Jim Carrey in the film. 
				__________________ Disneyland Resort trip reports and restaurant reviews and more The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  05-01-2006, 08:40 AM | #6 | 
| . Join Date: Feb 2005 
					Posts: 13,354
				            | I was fine with all the casting in the movie except Sam Rockwell whom I generally despise. But then I'm not a fan of the book (Adams only wrote one funny book in his life and it was non-fiction) so I'm not emotionally attached to any particular traits, characterisitics, or foibles that may have been added or removed in the adaptation. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  05-01-2006, 10:17 AM | #7 | 
| ohhhh baby | Hmm.  I don't have the Jim Carrey aversion gene that many do, but I can see how having him in the movie would turn off the Hitchhikers' fanbase. There was something major that was missing from the movie and I don't know if casting was it. 
				__________________ The second star to the right shines in the night for you | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  05-01-2006, 10:23 AM | #8 | 
| ... Join Date: Jan 2005 
					Posts: 13,244
				            | The movie was missing something.  I'm not sure what it was.  It was just kind of bland.  I loved the actor from 'The Office' who played Dent.  He's hysterical.  I also loved Bill Nighy. I don't know if Jim Carrey would have made it any better. He didn't help 'A Series of Unfortunate Events'. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  05-01-2006, 10:50 AM | #9 | 
| avatar transition | I didn't read the books, but I really liked the movie.  Arthur was one of the best parts, IMO. 
				__________________ And now Harry, let us step into the night and pursue that flighty temptress, adventure! - Albus Dumbledore | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  05-02-2006, 01:02 PM | #10 | 
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 
					Posts: 4,978
				            | Would have been interesting to see Adams' hand in the making, regardless of casting. As it turned out it *was* just kind of dull.  Arthur was well cast. Trillian was hot. Marvin was *very* well cast. I hated the Zaphod head-trick though. Foul. I know it's difficult. I don't care. I wanted to see two heads, side by side, and three arms. He was also poorly cast. Didn't like him at all. The ship looked pretty good from what I remember. I think it needed more of that wonderful British humor. I think it took itself too seriously. 
				__________________ Why cycling? Anything [sport] that had to do with a ball, I wasn't very good at. -Lance Armstrong | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   |