![]()  | 
	€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#21 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 ohhhh baby 
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
		
		
		
			 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	
	The second star to the right shines in the night for you  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#22 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Prepping... 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Here, there, everywhere 
				
				
					Posts: 11,405
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 They got each individual from social security numbers and the information provided to the IRS from employers.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#23 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Member 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2008 
				Location: Costa Mesa, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 57
				 
				
				![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 Individuals got $600, couples $1,200, plus $600 for each additional child. Those who made (I think) $75,000 or more were disqualified, or got a lower amount. People on social security or disability, who paid no taxes got $300 each.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#24 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 I LIKE! 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,819
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 It was 300 additional per child, not 600. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	The 600 individual/1200 couple was on a sliding scale for over 75K/150K. Can't remember exactly how the sliding scale worked.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#25 | ||
| 
			
			
			
			 Prepping... 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Here, there, everywhere 
				
				
					Posts: 11,405
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Here is some info from the IRS (it's surprisingly straight forward). 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
	
	Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#26 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Member 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2008 
				Location: Costa Mesa, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 57
				 
				
				![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 Sorry. I was going by memory. I should have known better. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#27 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Yes I have 3 girls =D 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: San Jose, CA 
				
				
					Posts: 609
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 We got $600, and spent it on bills & Taylor.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	![]()  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#28 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Chowder Head 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				Location: Yes 
				
				
					Posts: 18,500
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 I am curious about this sentence and wondering if there was an aspect I missed. Does the incentive somehow affect people's 2008 tax returns? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	
	The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. 
			- Abraham Lincoln  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#29 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 I LIKE! 
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 7,819
				 
				
				![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 I had read this but then I read that it was not factual.  From what i understand this is a true rebate (or rather redistribution of wealth) and there is no impact on 2008.  You don't even have to claim the rebate as income. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#30 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Kink of Swank 
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		 That's good, since I never got it. (And it was reducto-phased because of my income level anyways, bah.) 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
Submit to Quotes 
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
		
	
		
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |