|  | €uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. | 
|  03-15-2011, 07:07 AM | #71 | 
| Kink of Swank | I'd agree that the U.S. press pandering to the potential nuclear disaster is the kind of journalism that brings us Charlie Sheen Week and Lindsey Lohan Mania ... but can you understand how even the threat might play particularly hard in, ya know, Japan? | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 07:58 AM | #72 | 
| Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes 
					Posts: 18,500
				            | The initial quake has been upgraded to a 9.0 
				__________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 08:56 AM | #73 | 
| Nueve | Got final confirmation last night that all aunts and cousins are present and accounted for, even if not a bit hungry due to shortened supplies.  *phew* 
				__________________ Tomorrow is the day for you and me | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 08:58 AM | #74 | 
| Prepping... Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Here, there, everywhere 
					Posts: 11,405
				            | Yay! Would you know of an organization for donations to go out there (other than the Red Cross)? | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 09:18 AM | #75 | 
| Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California 
					Posts: 8,435
				            | Not having seen how the Japanese media is handling the situation, I can't comment.  I was referring to the coverage I've seen in the US media. 
				__________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 09:41 AM | #76 | 
| Kink of Swank | Well, the French national safety authority, ASN, has rated the Japan nuclear reactor danger level at 6 (out of 7 on the international scale).  Chernobyl was the only 7.  Three Mile Island was a 5. I don't watch U.S. news, but given this - I don't think serious concerns could be called "overblown." | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 11:38 AM | #77 | 
| Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California 
					Posts: 8,435
				            | Neither do I.  And don't get me wrong; there are serious concerns.  But most of what I see in the media is not serious concern; but overreaction at best and outright hysteria at worst. 
				__________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 12:11 PM | #78 | 
| BRAAAAAAAINS! | A dam burst in Fukushima prefecture, but I don't hear pundits talking about hydropower policy. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 12:40 PM | #79 | 
| . Join Date: Feb 2005 
					Posts: 13,354
				            | That's because it was an irrigation dam (but the point is valid). I'm far more concerned about Oroville Dam in a 6.0 earthquake than I am our various nuclear plants in an 8.5. Or look one one accident at a single drill site did last year in the Gulf. This is not to say that what is happening at the Japanese reactor isn't serious. But it can be serious and still be true that the press is over-reacting. And having a 6 rating on that scale does not mean that it will have any serious impact on anything other than a local scale. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-15-2011, 01:02 PM | #80 | 
| Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California 
					Posts: 8,435
				            | I haven't fact checked this yet, but I just read a comment that every nuclear plant in operation saves the burning of about 2 million tons of coal a year.  With 442 operating nuclear plants worldwide that's a total of 884 million tons per year.  Just think how much mining, waste, and pollution those nukes prevent. 
				__________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | |
| 
 | 
 |