Star Trek: The Swanking

innerSpaceman · 05-07-2009, 03:40 PM

Yes, but do any of you remember what "buff" was considered back then? Or if not buff, then movie-star attractive? None of the male stars from the 40's through the 70's looked like they ever saw the inside of a gym.

Not overweight or flabby, mind you. I suppose just more natural-bodied, but alas not the kind of ripped, buffed-out, accentuated M's David muscularity that modern culture ... and yeah, modern gay culture in particular ... have led me to expect when I hear that some guy's got a sexy physique.

That said, I'm all prepared to have the most major crush on the new Captain Kirk after tomorrow night!!

View Poll Results: Are you in?
Yes - OC	2	22.22%
Yes - LA	2	22.22%
Yes - Either	1	11.11%
What is this Star... Trek.... you speak of? Have fun!	4	44.44%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

05-07-2009, 03:40 PM	#11
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Yes, but do any of you remember what "buff" was considered back then? Or if not buff, then movie-star attractive? None of the male stars from the 40's through the 70's looked like they ever saw the inside of a gym. Not overweight or flabby, mind you. I suppose just more natural-bodied, but alas not the kind of ripped, buffed-out, accentuated M's David muscularity that modern culture ... and yeah, modern gay culture in particular ... have led me to expect when I hear that some guy's got a sexy physique. That said, I'm all prepared to have the most major crush on the new Captain Kirk after tomorrow night!!
	Submit to Quotes

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode