Not in the executive branch, eh?

alphabassettgrrl · 07-11-2007, 09:38 AM

I kind of like it. As noted above, it's not a great precedent to set, but I also agree that the Executive Branch is setting terrible precedents for just about everything *it* does.

Be interesting to see how this plays out. I have been astounded at the belligerancy of the Pres and Vice lately; refusing to comply with things that are not only historical and necessary, but entirely reasonable. Refusing to allow inspections of classified document storage, refusing to release what documents you're classifying, refusing to tell your overseeing body anything... makes a girl wonder what they're hiding *this* time.

07-11-2007, 09:38 AM	#11
alphabassettgrrl Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,978	I kind of like it. As noted above, it's not a great precedent to set, but I also agree that the Executive Branch is setting terrible precedents for just about everything it does. Be interesting to see how this plays out. I have been astounded at the belligerancy of the Pres and Vice lately; refusing to comply with things that are not only historical and necessary, but entirely reasonable. Refusing to allow inspections of classified document storage, refusing to release what documents you're classifying, refusing to tell your overseeing body anything... makes a girl wonder what they're hiding this time. __________________ Why cycling? Anything [sport] that had to do with a ball, I wasn't very good at. -Lance Armstrong
	Submit to Quotes