MouseAdventure Spring 2010

innerSpaceman · 03-17-2010, 03:18 PM

Ya know, I don't really consider hotel accommodations a "legitimate" reimburseable expense for a website that is primarily about Disneyland but for reasons convenient to the staff, is located somewhere else - such that visits to Disneyland requiring hotel stays are required for them to conduct a chunk of their business.

of course, it's a free country. But that just seems silly. In any event, the market will bear what it will - and if MouseAdventure and Disneyland itself become the province of the affluent only, then that's just the way it shall be.

I won't talk about MouseAdventure being better when it was cheap. It was better because it took place ENTIRELY within Disneyland, and not too much of it in a sterile ballroom. But it was no worse when it was cheap ... which begs the question, what is the added benefit for the buyers now that it's so much more expensive?

03-17-2010, 03:18 PM	#18
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Ya know, I don't really consider hotel accommodations a "legitimate" reimburseable expense for a website that is primarily about Disneyland but for reasons convenient to the staff, is located somewhere else - such that visits to Disneyland requiring hotel stays are required for them to conduct a chunk of their business. of course, it's a free country. But that just seems silly. In any event, the market will bear what it will - and if MouseAdventure and Disneyland itself become the province of the affluent only, then that's just the way it shall be. I won't talk about MouseAdventure being better when it was cheap. It was better because it took place ENTIRELY within Disneyland, and not too much of it in a sterile ballroom. But it was no worse when it was cheap ... which begs the question, what is the added benefit for the buyers now that it's so much more expensive?
	Submit to Quotes