Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > A.S.C.O.T > Lounge Lizard
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Clear Unread

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-17-2010, 07:57 AM   #11
Alex
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
Alex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of cool
If Judge Walker's ruling is eventually overturned, what would the status then be of any marriages from the period in between (if a stay had not been granted).

After Prop 8, I thought it pretty clear that the marriages that already existed should continue as there was no dispute that they were entirely legal during that too short window.

But for marriages allowed because a judge erroneously (technically) ruled in their favor it seems to me the case is much stronger that those marriages should be voided. That seems an acceptable justification, to me, to grant a stay.

I'm no expert, of course, so if this stay does fly in the face of established procedure or law I'd live pointers to more information. None of my usual law blog sources have expressed any real surprise at the stay or thought it technically inappropriate.
Alex is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 PM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.