Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > Squaresville > Daily Grind
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts Clear Unread

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-06-2005, 12:50 PM   #1
Ghoulish Delight
I Floop the Pig
 
Ghoulish Delight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alternative Swankstyle
Posts: 19,348
Ghoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of coolGhoulish Delight is the epitome of cool
Send a message via AIM to Ghoulish Delight Send a message via Yahoo to Ghoulish Delight
Right to die

I'm surprised no one's talked about this.

As much as I support the right, and the right of states to make the decission, I fear the feds might have a good case. As long as the blasted Controled Substances Act exists, this probably falls under federal jurisdiction.

And I don't think the scope of the case is broad enough to say either of the 2 things I'd really like to see said. The first is, "Controlled Substances Act be damned, this is clearly not under the purvey of Constitutionally granted federal powers and therefore is the state's choice." The other is, "Screw the CSA, we're calling it invalid here and now."

The second is clearly not an option, that's not the question before the court. I have a dim hope that the first might happen. But, sadly, if they rule it as, "Based on the existence of the CSA, the federal government has a right to enforce restrictions," I can't really say I can argue with that.

The best I hope for right now is an opinion, like the recent marijuana opinon, that says, "Based on existing law, we have to side with the feds...BUT, we really think someone needs to get to repealing that stupid CSA." Unsatisfying, but it'd be something.

Of course my other pie-in-the-sky hope is that the Court does shoot down the Oregon right to die act based on the Controlled Substances Act, sparking action to either legislatively repeal the CSA, or get a case before the court that would put the Constitutional validity of the CSA into the scope. It's so entrenched that I doubt it'll happen, but it'd be nice.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.'
-TJ

Ghoulish Delight is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.