So much for privacy

[scaeagles]

While I am no fan of abortion, I find this to be very disturbing. I cannot immagine why the first ruling by Anderson allowed Kline access to the records. Hopefully the appeals court will find differently. But I have a question - what if they do not? Is it possible that there is a valid reason for requiring these records?

This is what judicial review is all about. I certainly do not agree with every court decision, but should the courts rule against the clinic, what choice do they have? Destroy the records? Is the clinic management willing to put themselves in jail?