Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > Squaresville > Daily Grind
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Clear Unread

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-06-2007, 12:45 PM   #27
Tramspotter
Show me on the bear.
 
Tramspotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 445
Tramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digsTramspotter has the riff everyone digs
Send a message via AIM to Tramspotter
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWBear View Post
I have no problems (and fully support) hate speech laws. They are intended to increase to punishment for violent crimes that are the result of prejudice, bigotry, and hate. These laws do not apply in Ms Coulters case – she did not commit an act of physical violence.

I have a problem punishing motives and mindsets of any kind even if fully understood. And find people who would dangerous

Yes.

As seen by the gleeful tirade against Colter if we were to plug in a name of someone you completely disagree with targeting another group I wonder if your reaction would be the same

Ad hominem? Hardly. To reply to a nasty and inappropriate remark by condemning said remark is not an ad hominem attack.

WB attacked her looks is that germane to the issue at hand or acceptable to you during other political discourse?

And yes, I would react the same way if any other public figure made a remark of that type.

Fair Enough.

Yes.

Doesn't take much more justification to bring governmental power to bear in silencing speech.


No.

well if a mob starts forming or a sufficiency of punishment sub committee is ever put together I hope that they are as generous as you would be

I’m not trying to cast a shadow on you – just trying to interpret your post as best I can. You seem to be (to me, at least) defending her actions; as if you agreed with her and believe there was nothing wrong with what she said. If this is not what you meant, I apologize.
You use the phrase "her actions" and tone of the thought police. I am defending her right to "her free speech" and others their right to make their own conclusions If this is not what you meant, I apologize.
Tramspotter is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.