Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > Squaresville > Daily Grind
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Clear Unread

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-10-2007, 07:52 PM   #13
Alex
.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
Alex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of coolAlex is the epitome of cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Afraid View Post
Can we have anarchy and still get arts funding?
Yes, but probably not the arts funding you'd want. When Americans collectively decide to sponsor the arts, what you get is The Transformers.

I don't object to single payer government run health care because of the cost. I would still object to it if it turned out it would cost 1/10th what we collectively pay for it. I object to the form.

I supported the war in Iraq because of a threat I believed was significant enough to warrant action. That threat, it turns out, was not real. Knowing what I know now, I would of course not have supported the war then. But I didn't know it then.

So, we're in a war and I do not think it has been well managed and this has caused an inflation in the cost but it is a mess that needs to be dealt with. At this point I don't know to what degree the involvement needs to be military but I also don't think it is a clear but case where we should just wipe our hands and move on. Even if it is because of us that it is so, Iraq is now a major concentration for Al Qaeda and that shouldn't be ignored while we move our troops back to Kuwait and let the Sunnis and Shia blow each other up.

On the other hand, I don't think the war has cost us enough. We aren't really asked to sacrifice anything (and in the grand scheme of things $100 billion per year isn't a significant drain on our economy). There was an article about a month ago about a new Humvee design that has reduced IED fatalities to near zero (as of the article nobody had been killed in one don't know if that has changed in the last month) and they are getting them into combat zones as fast as possible but they can only roll off the manufacturer's line so quickly. I can't help but think in an earlier time when our leaders were inclined to ask sacrifice of the citizenry that the president or secretar of defense or someone would have been on TV and radio saying "we need 100,000 of these things in two months so we ask for America's help in making sure we get them."

It is bizarre to me that during World War II a single shipyard in Vancouver, Washington, could turn out an entire ship every day but we can't get more than 100 Humvees a week (or whatever the numbers) were because we must go on as if life is normal.

But that is all independent of the healthcare issue, so far as I'm concerned. With the money spent in Iraq you could also give every American family a new fuel efficient hybrid vehicle but that doesn't necessarily make it a good idea.
Alex is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.