Congressional approval rating lower than Bush's

[JWBear]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

Yikes. (Scaeagles reattaches his head) How about we don't live in a direct democracy.

My point was that electing a representative does not ensure that the representative will agree with us. This was in response to alphabassettgirl saying her representative is going to vote however they please (though I doubt it was worded in that fashion).

I happen to like the referendum process because it puts issues back into the hands of the people by direct vote. My representative, once elected, has no obligation whatsoever to vote in any particular way. That person will face election again in two years.

Yikes.

Sorry to go off. It's a sensitive issue for me.

You are correct in that we are not a direct democracy - something the Founding Fathers did not want, for very good reasons.

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff

....and to the "democracy" for which it stands...

or is it?

...and to the "republic" for which it stands...

Sometimes I forget

Yes, the pledge says "republic". This in no way negates the fact that we are also a democracy. Why does it have to be either-or? It is, in fact, both.

I was discussing this subject with Bill earlier, and he made a very good analogy. "Republic" is the form of our government, "democracy" is the method.