I knew it!

Motorboat Cruiser · 03-14-2005, 10:03 AM

Doesn't the possibility exist that there was more negative coverage of Bush because there were more negative things connected to him than Kerry? What I mean is, what if you said that there was a lot more negative coverage of Osama Bin Laden than the Pope? Does that prove media bias towards Christians over Muslims or is just that Osama is a sorry excuse for a human?

I wouldn't worry about it too much anyway. The way this administration is paying off reporters to push their agenda and spending 250 Million to release what appear to be real news reports that are actually blatant propaganda, things should be turning around nicely for you.

03-14-2005, 10:03 AM	#2
Motorboat Cruiser Cruiser of Motorboats Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: So Cal Posts: 3,665	Doesn't the possibility exist that there was more negative coverage of Bush because there were more negative things connected to him than Kerry? What I mean is, what if you said that there was a lot more negative coverage of Osama Bin Laden than the Pope? Does that prove media bias towards Christians over Muslims or is just that Osama is a sorry excuse for a human? I wouldn't worry about it too much anyway. The way this administration is paying off reporters to push their agenda and spending 250 Million to release what appear to be real news reports that are actually blatant propaganda, things should be turning around nicely for you.
	Submit to Quotes

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode