![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
scribblin'
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the moment
Posts: 3,872
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, you can do the video-encoded-FLV on an html page, and that will give the sense of movement. Java will work, to a point, but really, I think your best bet is to hire a flash artist to do something really simple for you. The "Love Machine Films" site has flash embedded in the html, and that definitely would require a flash artist. (And my flash guys suggest nixing the html and just going with full-flash; flash-in-html can bug out pretty badly - the LMF site, while lovely, was a tiny bit buggy.) Let me know if you need any contacts or suggestions if you want to go this direction; up-and-comers and/or some of my flash pals are often willing to do things for lower prices or for trade.
Last edited by LSPoorEeyorick : 02-06-2008 at 08:17 AM. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Community Fruit
|
Making an entire site in Flash is a horrible idea from a usability standpoint. Flash-in-HTML is the way to go if you do in fact decide to use Flash. The only reason a Flash-in-HTML site would be buggy is if it was coded improperly.
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
scribblin'
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the moment
Posts: 3,872
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Whichever way you go, T, I'm sure it'll look great. |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
SQUIRREL!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: On the curbside.
Posts: 5,098
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() For now, I'm working on a less fancy HTML site with some dynamics, but I'm all about making it super fancy for the long term. (Simple is not in my nature. ) And, at that point, I'll have an HTML alternative link for those who can't handle the Flash stuff. |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|