LoT Hidden Messages!

[Kevy Baby]

Originally Posted by RStar

I wondered if it had been mentioned before, I hadn't seen any mention of it.

Sorry for repeating.

And sorry for sounding snarky in my post - I did not intend to be so. I was rushed and tried to stick to 'just the facts.'

Not everyone can catch every post!

[RStar]

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby

And sorry for sounding snarky in my post - I did not intend to be so. I was rushed and tried to stick to 'just the facts.'

Not everyone can catch every post!

No, you didn't sound snarky.

I had thought about doing a search, but was too lazy. I was appoligizing for my laziness.

[blueerica]

I think they're under delusion, NA. Surely.

[FEJ]

the reason I chose only us three is that the other two are whom I conferred with at the time when we were doing design adjustments early on.

I only put those who were privy to the Easter egg at the time of creation.

[Moonliner]

Originally Posted by FEJ

the reason I chose only us three is that the other two are whom I conferred with at the time when we were doing design adjustments early on.

I only put those who were privy to the Easter egg at the time of creation.

Meh, I still think you should stick with my explanation.

[FEJ]

Originally Posted by Moonliner

Meh, I still think you should stick with my explanation.

ha ha

While not as exciting I figured I better chime in so people didn't think it was something personal to exclude anyone out of maliciousness. It was just fun tinkering with the HTML a couple years ago. €uro and GD were privy to it adit happened.
To be honest, I forgot it was there. If CP still feels slighted or excluded (I had no idea she took that much offense to it) it is easy enough to remove.

[Cadaverous Pallor]

Originally Posted by FEJ

ha ha

While not as exciting I figured I better chime in so people didn't think it was something personal to exclude anyone out of maliciousness. It was just fun tinkering with the HTML a couple years ago. €uro and GD were privy to it adit happened.
To be honest, I forgot it was there. If CP still feels slighted or excluded (I had no idea she took that much offense to it) it is easy enough to remove.

It's not so much for me, seriously. The biggest glaring omission is that the people that designed the logo aren't included. The amazing logo!

I was fine with it because I thought people wouldn't find it. But people keep tripping over it...and then it's brought up over and over. It's just incomplete, which means it requires explanation every time. At work, I'm constantly filling holes in procedure to avoid confusion in the future. I'm a born nitpicker, fact checker, verifier. So when people ask, I'm running up to fill them in.

I'm just glad Kevy is here to endlessly quote me

[FEJ]

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor

...It's just incomplete, which means it requires explanation every time.....

It is complete. It is what it is/was. Nothing more than a small and innocent statement made in jest. It had nothing to do with the logo (which is great, BTW) nor with excluding anyone who worked hard on creating LoT.

CP, Obviously it irks you, and even though you say it doesn't. As stated before it was never meant to be a slight at you or others. The reason I directed it at you is you were the only one who still seemed offended.

That said, The statement that is hidden seemed better than "GD, €, & FEJ know HTML and know the old school way to skew search engines. This is how FEJ is showing € how it works, and decided to leave it as a joke."

[Kevy Baby]

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor

I'm just glad Kevy is here to endlessly quote me

I don't quote you!

[Cadaverous Pallor]

Ok, it's "complete", in that YOU understand it. No one else does. I know it's "a small and innocent statement made in jest". I just don't like that we have to explain it over and over. Is that so hard to understand?