![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#11 | |
ohhhh baby
|
Quote:
![]() I remember the acting being poor, the lines being silly. The effects were spectacular but I just didn't buy this future. When they showed the holographic computer "screens" and Cruise moving really fast using it, I couldn't help but think, um, does he have some sort of speedy implant in his brain? Just because the visuals float instead of sit on a screen, it doesn't mean we can work faster. ![]() I think it just comes down to not buying it, which is a nebulous sort of quality. After the first 15 min of a movie, you're either in or you're out. We just saw Crank and I was completely sucked in to the concept. Even when the girlfriend character wrecked the 2nd act, I still felt committed, and still felt satisfied. That movie had a pretty far-fetched concept, but it worked for me. GD and I had a meeting of eye-rolling during the part where Cruise goes to the eyeball replacement guy. I remember feeling the whole bit was stupid. The guy's lines, his attitude, his overly-set-decorated-color-corrected room...it smacked of trying too hard and was nearly laughable. We discussed stopping the movie then, but continued. Again, it's been a while, but that's what I remember. Regardless, I'm never seeing that again. It was one of very few movies where I wish I had those hours back and my memory erased. Indy 4 wasn't that bad...
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|