![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#5 | ||
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This story was prompted by a bit of text written on the Change.gov web site. Originally it said:
Quote:
That text has seen been changed to read (and clarify the intent): Quote:
While I would have some big questions about the operation of such a thing (my high school had a service program in high school for credit and let's just say that the result was a lot of kids doing "service" that didn't help anybody, didn't require any effort, and looked good enough on paper to get some high school credit) I wouldn't be as strongly opposed (and might support depending on the extact program. Other questions: - The proposal of $4000 for 100 hours is $40/hour and strikes me as an insane rate of return meaning that in most situations the "volunteers" will be getting higher tax free pay than the people who do the same tasks as their job. It should probably be raised to at least 200 hours (still less than 4 hours/week). - This seems somewhat regressive. Even with $4000 assistance the worst off students will already be taking full class loads plus real paying jobs. Sure there's still a few stray hours in a week but it is another burden. - If use is widespread, how does it not just cause further tuition inflation. - Flooding the market in college towns will push regular employees out of jobs that will then be filled by government paid "volunteers." My high school experience with such programs doesn't give me much confidence in the real value of including such requirements in middle and high school curriculums but I don't really have a problem with them trying. |
||
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|