![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
#11 | ||
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
But yes, it is the end of a decade, just not one that anybody considers worth mentioning. And 12/31/2009 was the end of a decade. It happens to be one people feel like commenting on. 12/31/2010 will also be the end of a decade, but it also will not be one that very many people feel is worth commenting on. I'm sorry you don't like the cultural decision your society has made. I also am frequently in that boat. In this case, I don't care. But it isn't wrong, either way. Quote:
But hell, since it is all social convention anyway, you can do it this way and not even have to change dates in any history book: Rule 1: For purposes of dating CE dates, Year 0 is what was 1BCE. Rule 2: For purposes of dating BCE dates, Year 0 is what was 1CE. All dates currently written down remain correct. You get to party with everybody else instead of getting grumpy that they aren't waiting quietly another year with you, and the only people bothered are those calculating down specific spans of time that cross the BCE/CE line and they just have to remember to add 1. None of that, of course, is a serious suggestion. It is just intended to highlight that absolutely everything about our calendar and calendar celebrations is a social convention so picking some social conventions as more irritating is kidn of pointless. It's kind of like still being pissed off at the conversion to the Gregorian calendar from the Julian calendar. Or arguing that the Chinese are a couple months off on when the year ends and what a bunch of fools they are. Again, my larger point is not that you're wrong, you are correct that the first decade of the 21st century ends in 363 days. But for the most part, nobody cares and that's ok. Last edited by Alex : 01-03-2010 at 10:32 AM. |
||
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|