Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > Playboy > Disneyland and all things Disney
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Clear Unread

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-06-2012, 10:24 PM   #5
RStar
Senior Member
 
RStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Me & Manyard hangin out!
Posts: 5,433
RStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of coolRStar is the epitome of cool
Why is a theme park based on California being in California a problem? Because locals who live in California are board with it because they live here? Because visiters to California can step outside of the park and see the real California?

I was born and raised in California, as was my mom. I studied the history of California because it is so interesting. It's a very unusual place. I love California, so I enjoyed DCA, but not as much as I would have had it not been done on the cheep.

When I first visited Hollywood as an adult in the 80's, I was shocked. It was not what I had in mind. Then I went to USH, and found it a lot more fun (Hollywood is in a lot better shape now, BYW). So, is there really that much wrong with people visiting the state and seeing a stylized or fantasy version as well? Would I go to Paris and visit a theme park based on France? I could see it. Disney Sea is by the sea. Aulani is a Hawaiian resort based on Hawaii (ok, it's not a theme park, but it is a Disney property in Hawaii based on Hawaii).

The fact that Walt had a connection to LA & Hollywood is a reasonable usage of the idea. And my complaint from 2001 was that DCA, unlike other Disney parks, did not transport you to another time and place. At least now it's another time. And the lack of the Disney touch (Like disney characters) sorely lacking when it opened has also been adressed, as well as more things for smaller kids to do.

One measure of "if it is enough" (besides ticket sales, which will be skewed by curiosity about Carsland for the first year or two) will be the lack of complaints. In my opinion, yes I think they will be down to the level that Disneyland gets (I'll call that the standard, or norm), therefore "enough" to be considered successful. And I think it will stand up to the same hours and admission costs as DL, thus stand on it's own.

The other measure will be "can it stand the test of time". Will it still be here in 10 or 20 years? Or will it be razed to be replaced by a whole new idea? That I cannot say for sure, but I bet the Disney company is expecting to amortize the $1.1 billion over at least that long withought starting over again.
__________________
Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup!
www.StarTownGifts.com
RStar is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.