"White House Iraq Group" WH Memo-

[Ghoulish Delight]

Originally Posted by PanTheMan

Nice....What i posted was not an Article BUT if you go to "Wickapedia" and type in "White house Iraq Group" this is what you get.

Thanks for the Censorship!

Censorship? I provided a direct link to the material you were qouting and removed none of your own words.

If the material is not yours, and especially if it's more than a line or two, we prefer that you provide a link and quote a small portion. Copyright or no, you should be providing a link if the material is not your own. But beyond that, we neither want to tread anywhere close to copyright/plagerism lines nor is a post laden with extensive quoted material particularly easy to read. I would have allowed you to do your own editing, however by the time I saw the thread, it was beyond the window in which you were able to edit. If you'd like me to select a different excerpt from the material to quote in the post, I'd be happy to go back and do so.

[Nephythys]

It's basic posting etiquitte- post a link to material you are providing.

Good grief-

[Reaver]

lol. Good grief indeed...

[PanTheMan]

Good greif... Welcome Charlie Brown and Lucy... Where ya been?

Back to the Momo- PLEASE go back and check the Link again. It now links to the proper site and not some biased think tank site...Thanks!

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by PanTheMan

Good greif... Welcome Charlie Brown and Lucy... Where ya been?

Back to the Momo- PLEASE go back and check the Link again. It now links to the proper site and not some biased think tank site...Thanks!

It is not worth responding to someone who seeks out opportunity to insult us. I don't find your comment funny- so if it was meant as such, it failed.

Why is it you could not just take responsibility? Instead you lash out at GD for "censorship" and you act like we are asking for something unreasonable. Posting a link to info you post should be a common practice- or are we just supposed to take what you say and assume it's accuracy and context, on what, trusting your word? Come on- no one here is above posting their links.

[Reaver]

I like Snoopy better anyway.

[sleepyjeff]

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight

Looks like it's the latter...

From their main page.



They report on spin.

I stand corrected...I guess

[Name]

Dude.... You've been slippin lately

[sleepyjeff]

Just wait til next Spring when I get my Box Fan back

[PanTheMan]

Originally Posted by Nephythys

It is not worth responding to someone who seeks out opportunity to insult us. I don't find your comment funny- so if it was meant as such, it failed.

Why is it you could not just take responsibility? Instead you lash out at GD for "censorship" and you act like we are asking for something unreasonable. Posting a link to info you post should be a common practice- or are we just supposed to take what you say and assume it's accuracy and context, on what, trusting your word? Come on- no one here is above posting their links.

All has been fixed, but thanks for your concern.......My problem is, that when it was linked , it was linked to the wrong site, some think tank site with an obvious bias. I originally found what i posted on "Wickapedia" a neutral site. By linking it to a site with an obvious slant one way or the other, it kind of kills the meaning of it. I have no problem posting links, but as i have said before, I like to see what i am posting is several places before i bring it here to make sure i have an accurate story to back me up.

Also, it was changed "While i was out" so to speak, and when i returned, people had already begun to rip apart the site that it was linked to by a moderator, a site that i never visited. NOW it is linked to the site i got it from and all is good.