Lounge of Tomorrow

€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides.  


Go Back   Lounge of Tomorrow > Squaresville > Daily Grind
Swank Swag
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Clear Unread

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-02-2005, 11:32 AM   #18
jdramj
Trying to sleep
 
jdramj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 201
jdramj is coming on cooljdramj is coming on cooljdramj is coming on cooljdramj is coming on cool
Quote:
Originally Posted by scaeagles
Alex, while I can agree with you on the 1995 case, the 2000 case shows respect for precedent regardless of personal beliefs that abortion is wrong. It would have been possible and even completely within his judicial boundaries to rule differently in hopes the case would go the SC and they would rule differently.

I am in complete agreement here with scaeagles here (shocking I know). I think he has shown great restraint in setting aside his personal beliefs. I would much rather have a candidate with this type of track record than no record at all or one that totally supports his or her own personal cause to the point that the law is theirs for the changing, which ever way their political view point swings.
jdramj is offline   Submit to Quotes Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Lunarpages.com Web Hosting

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.