Major Terrorist Threat in UK-US discovered

[SacTown Chronic]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

We can play the hypothetical CA scenario all day, and all we do is end up rehashing the same arguments over and over with Sacramento and CA substituted for Baghdad and Iraq.

With one major difference....there's an active WMD in Sacramento, baby.



The 'W' stands for woman, right?

[Motorboat Cruiser]

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

With one major difference....there's an active WMD in Sacramento, baby.

Is Mickey Lumbo visiting?

[Motorboat Cruiser]

But, but, but... Barstow is doing quite well. Why don't the news media focus more on Barstow?

[scaeagles]

We've been over that, MBC....no need to focus on Barstow, but it might be best to point out that Barstow, Redding, and Eureka are not burning. I recognize the bad news is what is reported thing, which is really what it should be. When we get to the point that what is good happens to be unique and the most newsworthy, we are in deep caca.

[SacTown Chronic]

Also, if it's not too much to ask, I'd like to request that there be no bombs dropped on the Emerald Triangle. Thank you.

[Gemini Cricket]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

We've been over that, MBC....no need to focus on Barstow, but it might be best to point out that Barstow, Redding, and Eureka are not burning.

Yeah, there'd be news about Barstow, but who cares about Barstow?

And then people might say, 'Well this government is bombing California because they were bombed by Arizona by people who actually came from Texas. Why don't they investigate Texas more?' And the rest of the world would say, 'It's because of their oil, stupid.' And meanwhile, Arizona's terrorist leader, Janet Napolitano, has still not been found... but we think she's in Carlsbad Caverns somewhere...

[scaeagles]

Originally Posted by Gemini Cricket

And meanwhile, Arizona's terrorist leader, Janet Napolitano...

A point of agreement!

[Nephythys]

even if it was accurate?

[Ghoulish Delight]

Originally Posted by Nephythys

even if it was accurate?

Response #1
I know I shouldn't repsond to this because you're just a right wing trouble maker who's looking for an excuse to ruffle feathers, but yes, even if it was accurate. If the environment described in the preface bothers you, don't post. If you don't have a problem with it, just post and accept the reality of the environment you're posting in.

Response #2
Sure, even if it's accurate. If the environment described in the preface bothers you, don't post. If you don't have a problem with it, just post and accept the reality of the environment you're posting in.




Now, which of those responses is a contribution to a discussion, and which is a dismissive quip likely to just cause pointless argument?

[Nephythys]

Originally Posted by Ghoulish Delight

Response #1
I know I shouldn't repsond to this because you're just a right wing trouble maker who's looking for an excuse to ruffle feathers, but yes, even if it was accurate. If the environment described in the preface bothers you, don't post. If you don't have a problem with it, just post and accept the reality of the environment you're posting in.

Response #2
Sure, even if it's accurate. If the environment described in the preface bothers you, don't post. If you don't have a problem with it, just post and accept the reality of the environment you're posting in.




Now, which of those responses is a contribution to a discussion, and which is a dismissive quip likely to just cause pointless argument?

Meh- I was just playing around anyway. I know the environment- and I post anyway (actually- maybe in spite of it I post anyway)

Spoil sport


They've picked up alot of those missing Egyptian students....wonder what will come of all that.

..and harkening back to that "joke" World Trade Center movie opens strong (stronger than expected)