Disney's Dubious Path to 9/11

[sleepyjeff]

I can't dispute that.

[Gn2Dlnd]

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup

As for the idea that this is an effort by ABC to boost Bush or the Republicans for the upcoming elections, who are the people in on this? Pretty much the entire top leadership of The Walt Disney company and ABC are Democrats (at least to the degree that such things can be determined by campaign contributions). Iger, for example, so far this year has given $15,200 directly to Democrats and $2,500 to Republicans (and $5,200 to individual D candidates and none to individual R candidates).

The first answer that came to my mind was the writer and director. The writer, Cyrus Nowrasteh, in an interview with FrontPage Magazine struts his stuff,

"The 9/11 report details the Clinton's administration's response -- or lack of response -- to Al Qaeda and how this emboldened Bin Laden to keep attacking American interests. The worst example is the response to the October, 2000 attack on the U.S.S. COLE in Yemen where 17 American sailors were killed. There simply was no response. Nothing."

Her'es the actual passage from the 9/11 report,

After the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, evidence accumulated that it had been launched by al Qaeda operatives, but without confirmation that Bin Ladin had given the order. The Taliban had earlier been warned that it would be held responsible for another Bin Ladin attack on the United States. The CIA described its findings as a "preliminary judgment"; President Clinton and his chief advisers told us they were waiting for a conclusion before deciding whether to take military action. The military alternatives remained unappealing to them.

The transition to the new Bush administration in late 2000 and early 2001 took place with the Cole issue still pending. President George W. Bush and his chief advisers accepted that al Qaeda was responsible for the attack on the Cole, but did not like the options available for a response.

The director, David Cunningham, was gushingly profiled in Charisma Magazine,

This man knows what he wants. “My life's mission is to challenge and shape culture through film,” says Cunningham-son of Youth With a Mission founder Loren Cunningham. He grabbed Stephen Spielberg's attention after releasing To End All Wars, a $14 million War World II movie that got limited box office exposure but critical praise. The film was violent enough to earn an R rating, yet it was laced with a Christian message of forgiveness. Insiders expect Cunningham to eventually direct a film that will take evangelical faith into mainstream theaters. We are ready to buy some tickets.

The second answer occured to me in the form of a question. If Disney is populated by such staunch Democrats, then why would they hire these guys? I quote from Digby:

Disney/ABC cancelled the reality show featuring a gay couple, "Welcome To The Neighborhood," ten days before it was to air when James Dobson and the religious right threatened to withdraw their support for the conservative classic "Narnia."

Disney refused to allow its subsidiary Miramax, which specialized in controversial fare, to distribute "Fahrenheit 9/11" allegedly because they felt it was too political.

They made a deal with Mel Gibson, beloved on the religious right for his film "The Passion," to produce a film about the Holocaust even though they knew at the time he held extremely controversial views about the Holocaust and Judaism. They only cancelled the project when he was caught by the police drunkenly saying "all the wars in the world are caused by the Jews."

Now they have produced a blatantly rightwing work of fiction which they are saying is based on the official 9/11 Commission report and they are giving it away without any advertising. They sent out hundreds of screening copies but failed to send any to the Clinton administration officials who are trashed in the film or to liberal columnists and bloggers.

There's a pattern here folks and it isn't a pattern that shows ABC knuckling under to liberals. There is a huge amount of money at stake in all these decisions, but for some reason Disney seems to be more than willing to throw it away when it benefits the right wing: already produced films and TV shows are either cancelled or allowed to be distributed by others, while hugely expensive, controversial rightwing mini-series' are broadcast with no advertising and allowed to be downloaded for free by I-tunes.

Isn't that something that Disney shareholders should be just a little bit concerned about? If ABC is protecting its "Narnia" franchise, at some point you have to look at whether the price they are paying is too high. If they have thrown this kind of money away to appease the GOP for business reasons then their shareholders have just been taken to the cleaners.

So, Disney, that most Republican of companies, is actually run by Democrats who want to protect the bottom line, even if it means contradicting their own values. Politics, meet politics, you'll be sharing a bed.

[Gn2Dlnd]

Just got off the phone with my ex-roomie who works in scheduling at ABC. As you can imagine, her life is a bit hectic right about now. Yes, I got the "It's a movie, not history" line, but, when I mentioned the 100,000 copies being sent to schools, she said, "Yeah, well, we're trying to figure that one out."

Here's the fun wrinkle, President Bush is scheduling a speech on Monday night in the middle of the show's broadcast!

Rolling over for ass-holes who hate you makes them even more likely to disregard you.

Mebbe Disney should buy Fox if they really want to be all snuggly with the Prez.

[Scrooge McSam]

Gn2dlnd,

Did you see the report (from the Select Committee on Intelligence) on Pre-War Iraq Intelligence was released today.

Maybe Mr. Bush wants to talk about that on Monday night.

[sleepyjeff]

I find it laughable that a company which is chaired by George Mitchell(D)(former Senate Majority Leader) is being accused of "getting snuggly with the Prez."

[Gn2Dlnd]

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff

I find it laughable that a company which is chaired by George Mitchell(D)(former Senate Majority Leader) is being accused of "getting snuggly with the Prez."

I find it laughable too.

'Course, its not what I said.

[sleepyjeff]

My mistake---"want to be all snuggly with the Prez"

[Scrooge McSam]

Does the term "broadcast flag mandate" mean anything to you, sleepyjeff?

[Gn2Dlnd]

In post #42 I posit a theory explaining why Disney, a company with Democrats and Democratic supporters at the wheel would want to kowtow to Republicans. In post #43 I remark on the folly of such behavior and make a snide comment using tiny type and words like "mebbe," "snuggly," and "prez." I nudged my statement further into the world of the unlikely by using the word "if." Its also my feeling the Disney has no interest in buying Fox. But if they did, well...get it? Get it? Guess not.

"Politics makes strange bedfellows" is the expression with which you're probably more familiar.

[Gn2Dlnd]

Originally Posted by Scrooge McSam

Gn2dlnd,

Did you see the report (from the Select Committee on Intelligence) on Pre-War Iraq Intelligence was released today.

Maybe Mr. Bush wants to talk about that on Monday night.

Pretty damning stuff (psst, skip to the "conclusions" pages), but good for a different thread. Right now, I'm more interested in seeing Disney pull this agenda pushing propaganda piece from the airwaves. In the blog Time to Take Away Disney's Political Candy Matt Stoller fills in some of the holes and talks about the broadcast flag, copyright extension, and media consolidation, all topics near and dear to the Disney Company. And, sleepyjeff, reasons why Disney might want to "snuggle" with Republicans.