Super Tuesday

[scaeagles]

I have looked at the man and listened to what he's had to say.....the problem is that I can't imagine voting for someone who truly believes that 9/11 was our fault. It's not a conspiracy theory thing with him, but he seems to believe that terrorist attacks are justified by our Middle East policies, specifically the 10 years prior to 9/11.

Sorry. Can't do it. I find that view reprehensible. It isn't my goal now to debate policies in the Middle East....just expressing this disagreement with him which I could never get past. This view would have to be indicative of what his foreign policy would entail should he be elected.

[Moonliner]

It's not "Super Tuesday" but the Bitter East Coast primaries are this coming Tuesday. So far Obama is winning the commercial war over Clinton 9-to-0. I hope the voting goes that way also.

[Ghoulish Delight]

Originally Posted by Moonliner

It's not "Super Tuesday" but the Bitter East Coast primaries are this coming Tuesday. So far Obama is winning the commercial war over Clinton 9-to-0. I hope the voting goes that way also.

I don't have the list on hand, but Hillary made a statement last week that made it clear that there were only handful of states she was interested in actively campaigning in for the remainder of the primaries.

[BDBopper]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

I have looked at the man and listened to what he's had to say.....the problem is that I can't imagine voting for someone who truly believes that 9/11 was our fault. It's not a conspiracy theory thing with him, but he seems to believe that terrorist attacks are justified by our Middle East policies, specifically the 10 years prior to 9/11.

Sorry. Can't do it. I find that view reprehensible. It isn't my goal now to debate policies in the Middle East....just expressing this disagreement with him which I could never get past. This view would have to be indicative of what his foreign policy would entail should he be elected.

I completely agree. I don't like his views on International aid either. While we have gone into debt this way I see not reaching out a hand after disasters as completely irresponsible. Based on his views on Darfur it appears Ron Paul would have ignored the holocaust and done nothing.

[SacTown Chronic]

Guess you don't want the govt. out of yur dingleberries after all.

[BDBopper]

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

Guess you don't want the govt. out of yur dingleberries after all.

Not at the expense of irresponsible foreign policy. if you think the world hates us now they would hate us even more if we turned our backs on them and refused to be a partner on a global scale. Imagine the International fury if after the tsunami we refused to lend aid with money or troops. That's what would have happened in a Ron Paul administration.

Ron Paul would make an absolutely fantastic governor. I'd vote for him and I'd even campaign for him. However, he'd be a terrible president.

[Scrooge McSam]

Originally Posted by BDBopper

That's what would have happened in a Ron Paul administration.

What do you base that on?

[LSPoorEeyorick]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

...he seems to believe that terrorist attacks are justified by our Middle East policies, specifically the 10 years prior to 9/11...

Justified? No. Result of? In part, for damn sure.

[Kevy Baby]

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick

Justified? No. Result of? In part, for damn sure.

So then a Democrat's actions (or lack thereof) as President would be a significant contributor. 8 out of 10 years prior to 9/11/2001 (and probably the most significant chunk of time in regards to the 9/11 terrorist attacks), a Democrat was in the White House.

[LSPoorEeyorick]

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby

So then a Democrat's actions (or lack thereof) as President would be a significant contributor. 8 out of 10 years prior to 9/11/2001 (and probably the most significant chunk of time in regards to the 9/11 terrorist attacks), a Democrat was in the White House.

I didn't suggest otherwise, though I'd say it's been way more than 10 years of questionable foreign policy.