Question for the grammar Nazis

[Gn2Dlnd]

Productions'.

That said, how about, "Lightyear's above the rest."

Used to drive me crazy.

[Alex]

Different style guides give different answers so you'll find someone to support most any way you decide to go.

There is currently a bill in the Arkansas state legislature to give a final determination on whether the possessive of Arkansas is Arkansas' or Arkansas's.

AP style guide requires always adding 's to a singular noun to make it possessive. The New York Times styleguide would have you using Productions' without another s. The Chicago Manual of Style uses 's unless the final S in the singular noun is silent (Camus, Francois, Arkansas).

Way too much detail here.

So the key is to pick a style and just be consistent with it.

[Kevy Baby]

Thank you to all who responded (and who may continue to respond). I guess the definitive answer is that there is no definitive answer.

[innerSpaceman]

Yep, GD is right. Pronunciation is the key. I love that he used Jesus's as the example, and the one I've seen cited most often is Moses's. Heheh.

[LSPoorEeyorick]

It depends on the style guide for whichever company employs you. Mine, for instance, is s-apostrophe in all cases. Although it can be debated, I think you'll find that most of the standard printers and newspapers almost always side with s-apostrophe.

I know MBC discovered recently that there's a semi-accepted standard to use s-apostrophe-s for religious figures (Jesus's, Moses's, etc) but I think that's pretty silly.

[Motorboat Cruiser]

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick

I know MBC discovered recently that there's a semi-accepted standard to use s-apostrophe-s for religious figures (Jesus's, Moses's, etc) but I think that's pretty silly.

Actually, I think I was misunderstood. I was actually saying the opposite. According to good ol' Strunk and White:

1. Form the possessive singular of nouns by adding 's. Follow this rule whatever the final consonant. Thus write,

Charles's friend
Burns's Poem
the witch's malice

Exceptions are the possessives of ancient proper names ending in -es and -is, the possessive Jesus', and such forms as for conscience' sake, for righteousness' sake. But such forms as Moses' Laws, Isis' temple are commonly replaced with,

The laws of Moses
The temple of Isis

[LSPoorEeyorick]

Also, there's a general guideline my team follows in the face of such situations. If there's something that could be debated as to how it's stated, rephrase! If "I just visited XYZ Productions' website" gives you pause, say "I visited the XYZ Productions website" instead.

[Strangler Lewis]

I think Eats Shoots and Leaves says this breaks down according to English vs. British. I don't recall which is which, but one side will say Mr. Jones'; the other, Mr. Jones's. I think both agree that plural is simply s', e.g, the dogs' bones. Your example complicates matters because it is a name that ends in a plural. I would go with s' or, more likely, try to evade the problem as LSPE outlines above. To be even more uncontroversial--or less controversial--you might say "the web site designed for/run by/etc. XYZ Productions."

[Tref]

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby

Question:

If a company name (or any other proper name) ends in an "s" and you are speaking of something that belongs to that company, what is the proper way to say it?

If you were talking (well, writing) about the web site that belonged to XYZ Productions, would it be

Any thoughts?

My first thought is -- what kind of name is XYZ for a company? Is it short for Examine Your Zipper?

[Morrigoon]

I would use s' for written, but probably pronounce the extra s sound verbally.