Bye Bye Banks and Wall Street - Page 11

cirquelover · 09-26-2008, 01:03 PM

Makes me glad my Mom hasn't called me yet. Although I am very surprised she hasn't! I can hardly wait for the " You didn't pull all your money out of the bank?!! You'll lose it all!!" conversation. Sigh, it's awful hard to teach them anything at this age.

BarTopDancer · 09-26-2008, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cirquelover

Makes me glad my Mom hasn't called me yet. Although I am very surprised she hasn't! I can hardly wait for the " You didn't pull all your money out of the bank?!! You'll lose it all!!" conversation. Sigh, it's awful hard to teach them anything at this age.

And my dad is calling to reassure me that their accounts, especially the ones at Washington Mutual are fine and I don't have anything to worry about with my CU.

Ghoulish Delight · 09-26-2008, 02:20 PM

The fact that it's a terrible solution?

innerSpaceman · 09-26-2008, 02:21 PM

Where are you getting there's a filibuster-proof majority in either the House or Senate? Um, there isn't, or lots would have been done instead of 2 completely squandered years of NOTHING.

sleepyjeff · 09-26-2008, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Where are you getting there's a filibuster-proof majority in either the House or Senate? Um, there isn't, or lots would have been done instead of 2 completely squandered years of NOTHING.

No one is threatening filibuster. The Dems can do this if they want; but like Alex stated, they are afraid.

You can blame it on the Republicans, but asking them to go along with this is, to many of them, asking them to completely throw away their basic principles.

Alex · 09-26-2008, 02:26 PM

There's no filibuster in the House and there isn't much risk of a filibuster in the Senate.

The reason the Democrats won't pass it completely on their own is that no matter what solution is done (and regardless of whether ultimately the right or wrong thing) it will be generally unpopular in the short term. If they do it all alone it will become a campaign issue.

So, they need the cover of bipartisanship so that it doesn't become a weapon in the last month of the 435 congressional campaigns going on right now. And that is also why, unless there is extremely broad bipartisan support McCain and Obama will both probably find a way to not vote on it.

DreadPirateRoberts · 09-26-2008, 02:28 PM

Upcoming artwork from Mad Magazine:

innerSpaceman · 09-26-2008, 03:03 PM

First of all, I'm APPLAUDING the Republicans for the first time in decades for objecting to this socialist move on principal, or what appears to be on principal.

Andrew · 09-26-2008, 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

First of all, I'm APPLAUDING the Republicans for the first time in decades for objecting to this socialist move on principal, or what appears to be on principal.

iSm made a funny.

JWBear · 09-26-2008, 03:33 PM

Oh, those wacky homonyms!

09-26-2008, 01:03 PM	#1
cirquelover Cruising around in my automobile... Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Oregon Posts: 2,617	Makes me glad my Mom hasn't called me yet. Although I am very surprised she hasn't! I can hardly wait for the " You didn't pull all your money out of the bank?!! You'll lose it all!!" conversation. Sigh, it's awful hard to teach them anything at this age.
	Submit to Quotes

09-26-2008, 02:20 PM	#3
Ghoulish Delight I Floop the Pig Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Alternative Swankstyle Posts: 19,348	The fact that it's a terrible solution? __________________ 'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ
	Submit to Quotes

09-26-2008, 02:21 PM	#4
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Where are you getting there's a filibuster-proof majority in either the House or Senate? Um, there isn't, or lots would have been done instead of 2 completely squandered years of NOTHING.
	Submit to Quotes

09-26-2008, 02:26 PM	#6
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	There's no filibuster in the House and there isn't much risk of a filibuster in the Senate. The reason the Democrats won't pass it completely on their own is that no matter what solution is done (and regardless of whether ultimately the right or wrong thing) it will be generally unpopular in the short term. If they do it all alone it will become a campaign issue. So, they need the cover of bipartisanship so that it doesn't become a weapon in the last month of the 435 congressional campaigns going on right now. And that is also why, unless there is extremely broad bipartisan support McCain and Obama will both probably find a way to not vote on it.
	Submit to Quotes

09-26-2008, 02:28 PM	#7
DreadPirateRoberts Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 2,483	Upcoming artwork from Mad Magazine:
	Submit to Quotes

09-26-2008, 03:03 PM	#8
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	First of all, I'm APPLAUDING the Republicans for the first time in decades for objecting to this socialist move on principal, or what appears to be on principal.
	Submit to Quotes

09-26-2008, 03:33 PM	#10
JWBear Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California Posts: 8,435	Oh, those wacky homonyms! __________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society.
	Submit to Quotes