![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#2 |
|
ohhhh baby
|
VAM for the research!
__________________
The second star to the right shines in the night for you |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#3 |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Which 38 states do you see passing a gay right amendment to the constitution? I'd be amazed if you could get 15, let alone 38 (and an amendment would never get out of congress without a kill switch so you couldn't let it sit for 190 years like we did the 27th Amendment).
Or, to even get to that point, which 66 senators and 288 congressman? Even if the Democrats votes unanimously in favor of such an amendment (and they wouldn't) they're nowhere close the the threshhold. No, the only chance any time soon for full secured equality for gays is if the US Supreme Court decides that it is already there in the constitution. Just as there is no way we'd pass such an amendment I think it is probably (though we just got bit in the ass on that assumption, didn't we) true that an amendment to reverse the USSC probably wouldn't get anywhere either. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Kink of Swank
|
And I have to agree with Alex the only way to get this federalized is to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court.
And if the "Cali" Supreme Court goes against us, it seems as if we'd have a U.S. Supreme Court case right away. Would it be wise to take it there at this time? Would they even take the case? Does the current make-up of the Court bode well, or would waiting for some potentially more liberal future Court be wiser? Interesting questions. I wish my civil rights didn't depend on them. |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Would the latter even be reviewable by the USSC? (And if so, does it seem likely they'd grant cert?) |
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#6 |
|
the one n only
|
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Kink of Swank
|
I'm thinking a separate case againt Prop 8 on 14th Amendment grounds because, no, I don't think the technical Prop 8 case currently before the Cali Supremes would be reviewable by the Fed Supremes.
|
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#8 |
|
...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,244
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I like "Cali" as much as I like "Frisco". Bleh!
![]() |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#9 |
|
...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,244
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Chowder Head
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yes
Posts: 18,500
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
__________________
The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity.
- Abraham Lincoln |
|
|
Submit to Quotes
|