Justifiable Homicide - Page 2

blueerica · 06-18-2005, 08:48 AM

I'm wondering --- was the OP intent for humor, because although I think the act absolutely atrocious, I find some of the circumstances a bit funny. The cops said he had a "pretty good reason." I mean... the COPS said he had a pretty good reason to do it... the article assumes the cops are justifying his rampage, because pot is pot, and we don't want no chickens eatin' our pot, right?

I mean, I know I wouldn't want no chickens eatin' my pot...

I say, the man was stupid for leaving the pot in a place where the chickens could get at it. Who does that? Didn't he know chickens had the reefer madness?

SacTown Chronic · 06-18-2005, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blueerica

I'm wondering --- was the OP intent for humor, because although I think the act absolutely atrocious, I find some of the circumstances a bit funny.

Yes, humor. I find this cat to be a dipsh*t of the highest order. He deserves everything that happens to him.

blueerica · 06-19-2005, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

dipsh*t

I need to use that word to day.... Hell yeah!

Kevy Baby · 06-18-2005, 09:46 AM

It was a stupid act to kill the chickens. The entertainment value of watching a bunch of stoned chickens stumble around would have been worth letting the chickens live.

Also, I had been wondering what Tim Allen had been up to of late.

Betty · 06-18-2005, 03:05 PM

Maybe he should have killed the chickens humanely and then eaten them... would he have gotten high?

Kevy Baby · 06-18-2005, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Betty

Maybe he should have killed the chickens humanely and then eaten them... would he have gotten high?

Sounds much healthier than pot brownies!

CoasterMatt · 06-18-2005, 07:43 PM

Or just follow them around with a plastic bag like Chong followed the dog...

Kevy Baby · 06-21-2005, 10:16 PM

Why did he use a frying pan? Why didn't he just choke the chickens?

06-18-2005, 08:48 AM	#1
blueerica Nueve Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 6,497	I'm wondering --- was the OP intent for humor, because although I think the act absolutely atrocious, I find some of the circumstances a bit funny. The cops said he had a "pretty good reason." I mean... the *COPS* said he had a pretty good reason to do it... the article assumes the cops are justifying his rampage, because pot is pot, and we don't want no chickens eatin' our pot, right? I mean, I know I wouldn't want no chickens eatin' my pot... I say, the man was stupid for leaving the pot in a place where the chickens could get at it. Who does that? Didn't he know chickens had the reefer madness? __________________ Tomorrow is the day for you and me
	Submit to Quotes

06-18-2005, 09:46 AM	#4
Kevy Baby Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes Posts: 18,500	It was a stupid act to kill the chickens. The entertainment value of watching a bunch of stoned chickens stumble around would have been worth letting the chickens live. Also, I had been wondering what Tim Allen had been up to of late. __________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln
	Submit to Quotes

06-18-2005, 03:05 PM	#5
Betty Kicking up my heels! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: The Silver State Posts: 3,783	Maybe he should have killed the chickens humanely and then eaten them... would he have gotten high?
	Submit to Quotes

06-18-2005, 07:43 PM	#7
CoasterMatt BRAAAAAAAINS! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: One Step Beyond... Posts: 8,802	Or just follow them around with a plastic bag like Chong followed the dog... __________________ Do you like my photography? Visit photosbymatt.tumblr.com to purchase prints!
	Submit to Quotes

06-21-2005, 10:16 PM	#8
Kevy Baby Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes Posts: 18,500	Why did he use a frying pan? Why didn't he just choke the chickens? __________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln
	Submit to Quotes