Can we talk about porn?

[innerSpaceman]

Come to think of it .... though there are exceptions, I am one of those who is generally not attracted to people of other races. And so, in porn, I generally watch white folks go at it.

That's as far as it goes with wanting porn players to "look like me." But I suppose that's far enough.


.

[Snowflake]

Originally Posted by LSPoorEeyorick

Hear hear. About the chicks resembling figure, not the small boobs. I do not have small boobs, so I prefer the soft squishable sort (not the hard-like-melon sort that porn seems so often to offer.)

Imagine what their plastic surgeons go through, imagine what these women put themselves through. Being of a size myself, I can only wonder how they do manage to support those cantaloupes they parade about. I often wonder, and have never had the nerve to ask any guy I know who might be dating someone with this kind of industrial work done, what's the fun in all the fakery?

[CoasterMatt]

I dated a girl of porn for a short time - she didn't have the big boob work, but the girls that I knew that did were really freakin' spooky...

To the guys, it's just another day punching the c(l)ock

[€uroMeinke]

Originally Posted by Cadaverous Pallor

So, men, do you prefer porn that involves men that are more like you?

Caveat #1: I know the straight ones are going to say "I'm not looking at the guy", but still, I'm asking.

Caveat #2: If you answer "Why yes, that's why I hit "MonsterC0cks.com" all the time", then you've just gotten predictable

You know, again I think there is a gender difference at work. A lot of conventional (straight) porn seldom depicts a guy beyond his package. And I think that makes it easy to imagine the gal(s) in the porn are doing their thing to your surrogete thing. For me anyway it's easy to make the leap from look at what she's doing to that **** to what she could be doing to my ****. Color and size differences don't seem to matter to me.

I think a lot of women have a hard time disengaging in a similar fashion, and tend to compare themselves to the women in the porno (much like they do when flipping through fashion magazines, or checking each other out as a potential competitor).

I think there's also a visual gender difference in how we view our genitalia, penisis are by thier vary nature quite visible (at least in their arroused state). I suspect few women have spent as much time gazing at the wonders between their legs as men have. Thus the image of tongue on clitoris, probably is a bigger turn on for a guy than a gal, as the guy is more likely to have seen it or fantasized about seeing it. Likewise, you seldom see felatio filmed from a female perspective compared to that of a male perspective.

Perhaps we just need to give women the control of the camera more often...

But back to the question, for me personally, I'd prefer not to see Ron Jeremy again - but, I usually am focused on the woman and my surrogate fantasy ****.

[Strangler Lewis]

Originally Posted by €uroMeinke

Likewise, you seldom see felatio filmed from a female perspective compared to that of a male perspective.

Perhaps we just need to give women the control of the camera more often...

Throat cam?

[€uroMeinke]

Originally Posted by Strangler Lewis

Throat cam?

exactly

[Kevy Baby]

Isn't foreplay the part where I beg and plead?

_________________

Seriously, I like different kinds of porn. Sometimes the raw passion of the amateur stuff and sometimes the more stylized stuff you see in Andrew Blake films (if you have never seen it, "Hidden Obsessions" is a must see).

I want to go back and revisit "Behind the Green Door" some day and also check out "The Story of 'O' " (which I have never seen).

And put me as one of the many who really don't like big fake boobs. The so-called "porn boobs" are just rediculous.

No nudity, but NSFW:

Spoiler:

Also, when they do a bad job of dubbing the moans and groans. Which is why most porn is better with the sound off.

One other topic of porn that has not yet been brought up (at least that I can remember): the "money shot". Most women I've heard on this topic dislike this. It is nice to have a "finish line" but I am sort of undecided about whether I like or dislike.

Also, it seems like there is a broader acceptance of female-to-female contact than there is to male-to-male contact. Lesbian sex is perfectly acceptable in straight porn, but male-to-male contact is almost exclusively limited to "gay" porn

[innerSpaceman]

I hate the money shot. It's just so unrealistic. In the effort to keep things visual, they make the sex exclusive-to-porn.

I had one lover who seems to have gotten his idea of sex from porn and would routinely perform the money-shot in real life. Otherwise, and I think mainly so in the real world, it's primarily an internal affair.



.

[€uroMeinke]

There certainly is a difference between real sex and porn sex, the money shot being one. Also there are a number of positions you see couples engage in that honestly, aren't that comfortable and don't feel all that great. Likewise, any position that results in deep penetration or close physical contact will not give you a good gynacalogical close up and thus rarely appear in porn for any extended period of time in porn.

[Cadaverous Pallor]

Who says what is and isn't a part of "normal" sex?

If you want a money shot to be a part of your routine, you make it a part of your routine. I guess there's something to be said for convenience and clean up, but still, that's quite an interesting generalization there.

I'm not saying it's a part of my "routine", but I wouldn't be surprised if it was for other people.