![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
L'Hédoniste
|
Quote:
__________________
I would believe only in a God that knows how to Dance. Friedrich Nietzsche ![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Beelzeboobs, Esq.
|
You do mean when, right? Not if?
Now I have to think -- not sure I want to commit to my platform this early. Okay, FIRST thing, email all my friends from back when to say "see! told you so!"
__________________
traguna macoities tracorum satis de |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Go Hawks Go!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Parkrose
Posts: 2,632
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would split the government into Three sectors for Tax purposes. Two of the sectors would be controlled by the 2 largest political parties and the third sector by a coalition of all remaining political parties. Every citizen would be required to belong to one of the 3 sectors.
Because National Defense is Paramount all citizens would pay into a Defense fund(this fund will only be for the military defense of the US not its allies or overseas interests) Beyond that each sector would tax only the members of the sector and only for those things which they are interested in. This would promote competition between the sectors to keep taxes relatively low in order to retain members so pork spending would go bye bye. People who think a foriegn war is important would most likely join a tax sector that supports such action. People who think a ton of money thrown at education will fix its problems may join a sector that supports that. People who don't want the government spending money on anything may wish to join yet different sector. Right now we have Rs and Ds trying to outspend each other and that can't be good for the country; With tax sectors implemented they would be competing to see who could spend the least instead of the most....and that can only be a good thing ![]() |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Title
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: here
Posts: 779
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
or we could just build more diesel cars and convert them to run off vegetable oil....
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7646412/ and http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7603085/ sure, it uses diesel fuel to warm the engine, but once its up to operating temp, just flip a switch, now your running with a renewable, cleaner burning fuel that doesn't rely on foreign oil.....what a concept. of course the price of oil would probably drop drastically if these were mass produced and many people started buying them, and that just wouldn't be good for the investors in those oil companies
__________________
Signature
![]() Last edited by Name : 05-03-2005 at 05:19 PM. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I am all for cleaner burning fuels. But nothing will come without some sort of side effect. The buzz about hydrogen sounds great. The exhaust is water vapor. However, I've read that there is a concern that in major metro areas there would be so much water vapor produced it would actually change weather patterns. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Nevermind
|
Quote:
![]() (It could be argued that pollution has done it's fair share of changing weather patterns...) |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Go Hawks Go!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Parkrose
Posts: 2,632
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Title
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: here
Posts: 779
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Signature
![]() Last edited by Name : 05-03-2005 at 10:13 PM. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Title
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: here
Posts: 779
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I am sure some enterprising entrepenuer would jump at the chance to secure contracts with the hundreds of restauranteurs to make a few bucks for doing nothing more then a little filtering and redistribution. This type of thing has the same feel as linux to me, there were many people that I knew several years ago that said linux would never last, but it is still a thriving OS, in fact Red Hat was a very good stock at one point(I haven't watched their stock in several years, so don't know what they are doing now). So, I don't know what the reluctance is to ween ourselves off the fossil fuel tit is, but I would be more then willing to convert a car to run off diesel(I think the next four wheeled vehicle I buy will be diesel so I can use a different fuel). But back to the point, as more and more people take steps to use vegetable oil as an alternative fuel, the distribution needs would arise. It seems a far better solution to me then drilling for a pittance of oil in a pristine wildlife refuge, and who knows, maybe the market for agricultural products would improve decreasing the need for agricultural subsidies. Seems more a win-win to me then lining the already bulging pockets of the oil millionaires. I am a realist and understand that there will always be a demand for fossil fuels, but introducing a viable alternative that could help to decrease our dependance on fossil fuels as the only form of energy seems very promising.
__________________
Signature
![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |