Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - - (Spoiler zone) - Page 2

BarTopDancer · 11-16-2005, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by libraryvixen

It's Boober.

:snicker:

Going to see it on Friday after work.

innerSpaceman · 11-16-2005, 06:54 PM

I've got tix for a midnight show (yikes, Tomorrow night!) at the Vista Theater in Hollywood. My usual lining-up pals will be having a pot-luck dinner on the street and then hanging out till the wee hours.

Saturday night, I'm seeing a late show with zapppop and dozens of other L.A. friends at the world famous Grauman's Chinese Theater.

These will be the first two of a likely half dozen screenings.

I Heart Harry Potter.

Gemini Cricket · 11-16-2005, 06:58 PM

Going either to a midnight show tomorrow or sometime on Friday. Can't wait.

And it is Boober. The others are Gobo, Red, Mokey and Wembley. Then there are the Doozers, the Gorgs, the Trash Heap... etc.

Cadaverous Pallor · 11-17-2005, 11:38 AM

I'm going to see it, um, soon. Sunday? Idunno. I work Saturday so no matinees then, maybe a matinee on Sunday.

libraryvixen · 11-18-2005, 12:29 PM

I went!

It was low key in terms of people dressing up. The one thing I have to say for the big crowd, it was the best crowd to go and see it with. They were very polite amd well behaved. We got awesome trailers: Aeon Flux, Superman Returns, King Kong, Happy Feet (a super cute CG Penguin movie), and Monster House.

The movie was fantastic, though I admit the underwater scenes were creepy. *shudder* I thought Ralph Finnes was amazing as Voldy. A girl next to me said "Ewwww.... he looks like Michael Jackson with that nose". I guess it was funny because it was 2 A.M.

innerSpaceman · 11-18-2005, 01:19 PM

Well, I was very entertained by and also pretty disappointed in GoF.

This was a return to the "scenes from" style of directing. Meaning, ahem, there was no style to the directing efforts by Mike Newell.

After the beautiful direction of the last outting, a return to this more juevenile style was a let-down, as I'd hope the films would continue to become more adult in style as the characters got older.

It didn't help matters that Goblet returns to the same old story pattern used in the two first films of a vague McGuffin device, hinted at but barely dealt with during a Hogwarts term, that transports Harry to a brief and predictible encounter with Voldemort in the final act. Ho and hum.

The story is not the director's fault, but the more childish story construction coupled with far less inspired pacing, editing, and other tangibles of film direction, left this film deep in the shadows of Prisoner of Azkaban, imo.

That being said, I was thoroughly entertained throughout. This is by no means an unenjoyable film. But I consider it back to the realm of kiddie movie style, despite some scary elements and "afterschool special" adolescent themes. Yet the visuals were good, the story moved along, and there was excitement and humor in good measure.

On the other hand, the story editing was atrocious. I know they had to cut a bunch of stuff out, but the film seemed really choppy to me. The arrangement of scenes seemed thrown together rather than artfully assembled.

And, much to my great disappointment, it seems to me that both Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson have either passed their attractiveness prime, or are each going through an awkward stage of development. Advance still pictures from the movie had me thinking they were continuing to get sexier with (finally legal) age, but I found the two of them surprisingly unappealing this time around.

And speaking of unappealing, I think this story goes way too far in portraying Harry and especially Ron as the biggest losers at Hogwarts. Watching the film, I began to wonder why we should care about these two characters who were such dreadfully unlikeable dorks.

I don't mean to sound so down on it. I like the series, and this one might end up being my second favorite (official Zlick ranking pending). I laughed a lot, and I was never bored. Brendan Gleeson as Mad Eye (or technically Crouch as Mad Eye) was a stand out, and hugely enjoyable. But the movie's a step down in quality from PofA, and that's a source of unfortunate disappointment.

Gemini Cricket · 11-18-2005, 01:42 PM

I saw it today. I loved this film. I think it's the best of the bunch so far.

Spoiler:

libraryvixen · 11-18-2005, 04:01 PM

Spoiler:

innerSpaceman · 11-18-2005, 04:32 PM

Yes, it was Hitleresque. I thought the actor who played him did a good job. (Not so good a job that I can, alas, remember his name).

Oh, and have fun with spoiler "tags" if you like, but this thread is a free spoiler zone.

libraryvixen · 11-18-2005, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Oh, and have fun with spoiler "tags" if you like, but this thread is a free spoiler zone.

I just followed GC

11-16-2005, 06:54 PM	#2
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	I've got tix for a midnight show (yikes, Tomorrow night!) at the Vista Theater in Hollywood. My usual lining-up pals will be having a pot-luck dinner on the street and then hanging out till the wee hours. Saturday night, I'm seeing a late show with zapppop and dozens of other L.A. friends at the world famous Grauman's Chinese Theater. These will be the first two of a likely half dozen screenings. I Heart Harry Potter.
	Submit to Quotes

11-16-2005, 06:58 PM	#3
Gemini Cricket ... Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 13,244	Going either to a midnight show tomorrow or sometime on Friday. Can't wait. And it is Boober. The others are Gobo, Red, Mokey and Wembley. Then there are the Doozers, the Gorgs, the Trash Heap... etc.
	Submit to Quotes

11-17-2005, 11:38 AM	#4
Cadaverous Pallor ohhhh baby Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Parental Bliss Posts: 12,364	I'm going to see it, um, soon. Sunday? Idunno. I work Saturday so no matinees then, maybe a matinee on Sunday. __________________ The second star to the right shines in the night for you
	Submit to Quotes

11-18-2005, 12:29 PM	#5
libraryvixen is part of the resistance Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: up North Posts: 963	I went! It was low key in terms of people dressing up. The one thing I have to say for the big crowd, it was the best crowd to go and see it with. They were very polite amd well behaved. We got awesome trailers: Aeon Flux, Superman Returns, King Kong, Happy Feet (a super cute CG Penguin movie), and Monster House. The movie was fantastic, though I admit the underwater scenes were creepy. shudder I thought Ralph Finnes was amazing as Voldy. A girl next to me said "Ewwww.... he looks like Michael Jackson with that nose". I guess it was funny because it was 2 A.M. __________________ Yes, I'm still alive!
	Submit to Quotes

11-18-2005, 01:19 PM	#6
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Well, I was very entertained by and also pretty disappointed in GoF. This was a return to the "scenes from" style of directing. Meaning, ahem, there was no style to the directing efforts by Mike Newell. After the beautiful direction of the last outting, a return to this more juevenile style was a let-down, as I'd hope the films would continue to become more adult in style as the characters got older. It didn't help matters that Goblet returns to the same old story pattern used in the two first films of a vague McGuffin device, hinted at but barely dealt with during a Hogwarts term, that transports Harry to a brief and predictible encounter with Voldemort in the final act. Ho and hum. The story is not the director's fault, but the more childish story construction coupled with far less inspired pacing, editing, and other tangibles of film direction, left this film deep in the shadows of Prisoner of Azkaban, imo. That being said, I was thoroughly entertained throughout. This is by no means an unenjoyable film. But I consider it back to the realm of kiddie movie style, despite some scary elements and "afterschool special" adolescent themes. Yet the visuals were good, the story moved along, and there was excitement and humor in good measure. On the other hand, the story editing was atrocious. I know they had to cut a bunch of stuff out, but the film seemed really choppy to me. The arrangement of scenes seemed thrown together rather than artfully assembled. And, much to my great disappointment, it seems to me that both Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson have either passed their attractiveness prime, or are each going through an awkward stage of development. Advance still pictures from the movie had me thinking they were continuing to get sexier with (finally legal) age, but I found the two of them surprisingly unappealing this time around. And speaking of unappealing, I think this story goes way too far in portraying Harry and especially Ron as the biggest losers at Hogwarts. Watching the film, I began to wonder why we should care about these two characters who were such dreadfully unlikeable dorks. I don't mean to sound so down on it. I like the series, and this one might end up being my second favorite (official Zlick ranking pending). I laughed a lot, and I was never bored. Brendan Gleeson as Mad Eye (or technically Crouch as Mad Eye) was a stand out, and hugely enjoyable. But the movie's a step down in quality from PofA, and that's a source of unfortunate disappointment.
	Submit to Quotes

11-18-2005, 01:42 PM	#7
Gemini Cricket ... Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 13,244	I saw it today. I loved this film. I think it's the best of the bunch so far. Spoiler: I was kind of upset about the Rita Skeeter beetle scene was cut. Maybe it'll be in the extended DVD version. I absolutely loves the World Cup in the beginning. It was exactly how I envisioned it. No Dursleys this time. But I guess that's okay. Lot of ground to cover with this film. I remember in the preview seeing the Death Eaters floating muggles above the crowd when they appeared and destroyed the camp. Does anyone else remember seeing that? They could have clued us in that the girl Fleur hung out with was Fleur's sister... The maze was okay in my opinion, but I do remember some sort of creature living in there... Loved the dragons. I loved all the lighthearted moments. Newell knew that they had to be successfully funny to offset the dark moments. I must admit, I cried when his parents showed up. I love that part, in the book and now in the movie... If I think of any more to say, I'll post it. Thumbs up. Four and a half stars. Loved GOF.
	Submit to Quotes

11-18-2005, 04:01 PM	#8
libraryvixen is part of the resistance Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: up North Posts: 963	Spoiler: Is it me? Or did Barty Crouch Sr. Have an extended Hitler mustache? __________________ Yes, I'm still alive!
	Submit to Quotes

11-18-2005, 04:32 PM	#9
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Yes, it was Hitleresque. I thought the actor who played him did a good job. (Not so good a job that I can, alas, remember his name). Oh, and have fun with spoiler "tags" if you like, but this thread is a free spoiler zone.
	Submit to Quotes