The random political thoughts thread (Part Deux) - Page 269

Snowflake · 01-29-2008, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SacTown Chronic

I'd vote for Obama even if I did disagree with him on every political issue simply because I perceive him to be a good and honorable man....and that's good enough for me these days. In fact, that's better than good enough -- it's a goddamned better thing than we've had politics-wise in this country for a long time.

So yeah, I'm giving Barrack Obama the chance to fall flat on his face as president. The results can't be any worse than what Bush has wrought.

Why the fvck not?

STC, I have to agree with you here. I cannot, in all good conscience, lob a vote in Hillary's direction since I do not believe her to be good or honorable (her not being a man is immaterial). I'm leaning very heavily in Obama's direction.

My questions is, if Obama lands the nomination, who will land on the ticket as veep. Would an Obama/Edwards ticket be the go?

SacTown Chronic · 01-29-2008, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowflake

I cannot, in all good conscience, lob a vote in Hillary's direction since I do not believe her to be good or honorable (her not being a man is immaterial).

Her lack of a penis is a cause for concern for me for one very big reason:

Hillary will feel the need to show that she is as tough as any man. Imagine insecure little Republican gay boyz playing war games and multiply by 3....that'll be Hillary.

scaeagles · 01-29-2008, 05:14 AM

I'm really, really enjoying watching other dems become the victims of the Clinton's tactics of smearing and distortion. I'm enjoying watching dem pundits and commentators coming around to see them for what I've always thought they were - power hungry to such an extreme that they will say or do anything to maintain it or acquire more.

I will admit I find Obama to be a decent and honest guy, though it is easy to speak of "change" without defining exactly what change is and what the specifics of said change is.

innerSpaceman · 01-29-2008, 08:23 AM

Heavens to mergatroids, please don't say the Clintons are nasty in a campaign fight. Let it not be so! I'd hate for them to be so unlike other politicians.

(That said, Bill's attack tactics have sort of backfired on the Clintons)

Moonliner · 01-29-2008, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

(That said, Bill's attack tactics have sort of backfired on the Clintons)

Technically it backfired on Clinton singular not plural.

Do you think Bill really wants to be first husband? I keep thinking not, which could help explain these rather atypical tactics from the consummate campaigner.

scaeagles · 01-29-2008, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Heavens to mergatroids, please don't say the Clintons are nasty in a campaign fight. Let it not be so! I'd hate for them to be so unlike other politicians.

My point is that they have been so revered by the left in general, and their tactics always praised. Now that those same tactics are being used on their own, the left doesn't seem to like it so much.

Of course politics is a dirty game and i don't expect it to be otherwise. I just like that the Clintons are being called on the tactics they've always used against the right.

And looking at Obama, while I would not vote for him, I do respect him. I do not regard him as being the typical dirty campaigner.

Moonliner · 01-29-2008, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Heavens to mergatroids, please don't say the Clintons are nasty in a campaign fight. Let it not be so! I'd hate for them to be so unlike other politicians.

I think the point is that Hillary is truly nasty as opposed to just campaign nasty. It's a subtle but rather important point.

Strangler Lewis · 01-29-2008, 10:41 AM

I don't know if it's heart medication or the bitterness of age, but I think Bill Clinton's lost a bit of the expansive, intellectual joie de vivre that made him so attractive, at least on paper. I remember seeing him on Jon Stewart a year or two ago, and he seemed so set on getting his digs in on his critics that when Stewart would jump in with jokes, he seemed rattled.

innerSpaceman · 01-29-2008, 10:55 AM

Yeah, um, old. Time will do that to you. Oh, and of course the presidency for 8 years ages you 17.

* * * * *

Meanwhile, Republicans better get off their high horse about supporting John McCain. Otherwise, he's going to have a hard time winning states that don't allow Dems and Independents to vote in GOP primaries. That's where lots of his support currently is. But that's precisely why he's the MOST ELECTIBLE REPUBLICAN ... sheesh. Get a Clue.

Core Republicans froth at the thought that McCain, as president, might actually cooperate with Democrats to get things done. He's done so in the past. He also has a very consistently conservative voting record, which Republicans tend to overlook. But it's precisely because they can't stand to consider compromise that they might be willing to forego supporting the ONLY Republican that can win a presidential election in the current electoral climate.

That's the kind of thing that sickens me about conseratives and some Republicans. The want the people of our country to be at war with one another. Meanwhile, if McCain wins the GOP nomination, I will consider voting for him. And it's precisely because, though I support Hillary Clinton, I don't particularly want a president who will be loathed by half the nation.

Republicans revel in the fact that half our nation hated George Bush (now two-thirds, btw). Maybe it's a weakness of good people that we'd rather sacrifice something for the sake of others (i.e., our first choice but divisive president for our 3rd choice but more uniting president). I happen to think it's a great strength, if only of character.

But that's the most important kind.

Ghoulish Delight · 01-29-2008, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innerSpaceman

Republicans revel in the fact that half our nation hated George Bush (now two-thirds, btw). Maybe it's a weakness of good people that we'd rather sacrifice something for the sake of others (i.e., our first choice but divisive president for our 3rd choice but more uniting president). I happen to think it's a great strength, if only of character.

But that's the most important kind.

And yet you're voting for Hillary over Obama?

01-29-2008, 05:14 AM	#3
scaeagles I LIKE! Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 7,819	I'm really, really enjoying watching other dems become the victims of the Clinton's tactics of smearing and distortion. I'm enjoying watching dem pundits and commentators coming around to see them for what I've always thought they were - power hungry to such an extreme that they will say or do anything to maintain it or acquire more. I will admit I find Obama to be a decent and honest guy, though it is easy to speak of "change" without defining exactly what change is and what the specifics of said change is.
	Submit to Quotes

01-29-2008, 08:23 AM	#4
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Heavens to mergatroids, please don't say the Clintons are nasty in a campaign fight. Let it not be so! I'd hate for them to be so unlike other politicians. (That said, Bill's attack tactics have sort of backfired on the Clintons)
	Submit to Quotes

01-29-2008, 10:41 AM	#8
Strangler Lewis Doing The Job Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: In a state Posts: 3,956	I don't know if it's heart medication or the bitterness of age, but I think Bill Clinton's lost a bit of the expansive, intellectual joie de vivre that made him so attractive, at least on paper. I remember seeing him on Jon Stewart a year or two ago, and he seemed so set on getting his digs in on his critics that when Stewart would jump in with jokes, he seemed rattled. __________________ Live now-pay later. Diner's Club!
	Submit to Quotes

01-29-2008, 10:55 AM	#9
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Yeah, um, old. Time will do that to you. Oh, and of course the presidency for 8 years ages you 17. * * * * * Meanwhile, Republicans better get off their high horse about supporting John McCain. Otherwise, he's going to have a hard time winning states that don't allow Dems and Independents to vote in GOP primaries. That's where lots of his support currently is. But that's precisely why he's the MOST ELECTIBLE REPUBLICAN ... sheesh. Get a Clue. Core Republicans froth at the thought that McCain, as president, might actually cooperate with Democrats to get things done. He's done so in the past. He also has a very consistently conservative voting record, which Republicans tend to overlook. But it's precisely because they can't stand to consider compromise that they might be willing to forego supporting the ONLY Republican that can win a presidential election in the current electoral climate. That's the kind of thing that sickens me about conseratives and some Republicans. The want the people of our country to be at war with one another. Meanwhile, if McCain wins the GOP nomination, I will consider voting for him. And it's precisely because, though I support Hillary Clinton, I don't particularly want a president who will be loathed by half the nation. Republicans revel in the fact that half our nation hated George Bush (now two-thirds, btw). Maybe it's a weakness of good people that we'd rather sacrifice something for the sake of others (i.e., our first choice but divisive president for our 3rd choice but more uniting president). I happen to think it's a great strength, if only of character. But that's the most important kind.
	Submit to Quotes