![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Prepping...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Here, there, everywhere
Posts: 11,405
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
How do you explain talking burning bushes if drugs weren't involved?
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Señora
|
Hey, SCAEagles, do you watch The Naked Archaeologist? I love that show.
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
I Floop the Pig
|
Nontrovercy du jours - Gen. Wesley Clark (ret.) is getting ripped apart for daring to say that military service and being a P.O.W. does not de facto make you President material.
Umm, what's wrong with that statement? Are we to believe instead that every single member of the military, every single person who's ever been in command in the military is automatically qualified to be President? That's some pretty loose qualifications if so. I wish Obama weren't playing so safe and trying to distance himself from the statement. It's exactly the kind of point that needs to be made. Perceived experience with no meat behind it should not be taken for granted just because the dude's a hero.
__________________
'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Kink of Swank
|
I'll go one further. Being endlessly tortured in a prisoner of war camp is likely the LAST thing that should qualify you to be President of the U.S.
It should qualify you for lifelong psychological monitoring, but that's about it. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Worn Romantic
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Beach California
Posts: 8,435
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Of course this is all coordinated, and I don't know why one would think otherwise. The candidate arranges with various individuals to put things on the table and then distances themselves from the statement. Not uncommon, and of course Obama is doing it.
They just want it ouu there to say (incorrectly, IMO) that McCain is not experienced in these areas and bears no special qualifications, because that is a major area that McCain has Obama beaten. Obama has no experience whatsoever, so the goal is to make McCains seem not so impressive. Frankly, this is about the only area I do have confidence in McCain. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And by the way, Clark speaking of Kerry's involvement in Vietnam is exactly the opposite of this.....He praised these thing about Kerry in 2004 and while did not directly say that it nmade him more qualified, the implication was clearly there. Hmmm....I wonder what changed....
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Valued member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 541
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Throw that in with Stephen Baldwin (Alec's brother) and McCain has this in the bag.
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
I LIKE!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,819
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, there wasn't any doubt, but Striesand has thrown her support behind Obama. Does any candidate really want these?
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |