|  | €uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. | 
|  03-31-2009, 12:42 PM | #361 | 
| ohhhh baby | Am I missing something? 
				__________________ The second star to the right shines in the night for you | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-31-2009, 12:49 PM | #362 | 
| Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California 
					Posts: 8,435
				            | 
				__________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-31-2009, 12:55 PM | #363 | 
| Go Hawks Go! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Parkrose 
					Posts: 2,632
				            | ^Exactly! It was a flashback to a scene from a previous episode...except, it wasn't  
				__________________ River Guardian-less | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-31-2009, 02:18 PM | #364 | 
| Worn Romantic Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Long Beach California 
					Posts: 8,435
				            | I believe that it isn't the first time they did that (same event, but slightly different when viewed from the perspective of two different characters). Are they trying to tell us something, or are they messing with our minds? 
				__________________ Unrestrained frivolity will lead to the downfall of modern society. | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-31-2009, 02:20 PM | #365 | 
| I Floop the Pig | Or are they not reshooting, but using the best takes they had to string together approximately the same scene from different angles with no intention of changing them meaning at all, hoping no one notices? 
				__________________ 'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-31-2009, 08:11 PM | #366 | 
| ohhhh baby | I did notice the difference, but I thought, yeah, that's what they have always done.  In the first season we learned about people's pasts in piecemeal flashbacks that we thought went a certain way but were later revealed to be less than full stories.  Sun has flashbacks showing Jin being mean to her and coming home with blood on his hands.  Jin has flashbacks and we see him under pressure from her dad, doing the dirty work and coming home with blood on his hands.  Same scenes, different angles, extra dialog, more information. 
				__________________ The second star to the right shines in the night for you | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  03-31-2009, 10:09 PM | #367 | |
| Go Hawks Go! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Parkrose 
					Posts: 2,632
				            | Quote: 
 And that probably is what this is....but this time it wasn't just extra dialog....some of the words were changed altogether. Can you tell I love this show  
				__________________ River Guardian-less | |
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  04-01-2009, 10:02 PM | #368 | 
| Prepping... Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Here, there, everywhere 
					Posts: 11,405
				            | DUDE (the 2nd to last scene). | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  04-01-2009, 10:31 PM | #369 | 
| I Floop the Pig | Boooooooooooooooooo! I, for one LIKE th new Jack. Horrible. Horrible episode. Horrible. It's BEN! It's freaking BEN! "Innocent child" my ass. It's fvcking Ben. Period. End of story. There is NO reason any of those three should be going to any effort to save the little fvck. It's BEN! But alright, let's pretend I overlook that utter, absurd, ridiculous, completely fvcking stupid bullsh*t that they for some ridiculous reason care about Ben simply because he's a child, never mind that he grown up to be BEN! Let's pretend I accept the retardedly simplistic "but he's a CHILD" crap. Yes, let's pretend. So they find Richard. And he says, "He'll lose his innocence, you sure?" There. Goodbye to the only SHRED of justification for them wanting to save Ben. He's not "Ben" yet, he's just an innocent boy, right? Well here's Richard telling you he'll lose his innocence. So hey, no more reason to save him, right? No more innocence, right? No? You're going to go ahead and save his evil ass? Seirously? W. T. F.?!?!?! Bullsh*t. There isn't a reason in the effing world that any of them should have wanted to save Ben, child or not. Period. Bullsh*t. 
				__________________ 'He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.' -TJ | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   | 
|  04-01-2009, 10:38 PM | #370 | 
| Prepping... Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Here, there, everywhere 
					Posts: 11,405
				            | If what happened already happened (the cleanse and other events) then it's playing out as it's supposed to happen. They aren't able to change the future. I wonder if this event took place before or after Richard and Ben met in the jungle a few seasons ago. It was interesting that Richard took him to Jacob's cabin, and there was a shadow in there. I heard someone say he should clear it with Charles and someone else. Did anyone catch the other name? | 
|   | Submit to Quotes   |