SacTown's Newest Friend

[Scrooge McSam]

Wow I feel like we should light a candle together or something

[sleepyjeff]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

Yeah, MBC - the dems best strategy, as I see it, is to approve Roberts without any votes against. This way, should Rehnquist (or Stevens, for that matter) retire, they can oppose anyone vehemently with Roberts as evidence that they don't just oppose everyone Bush offers up.

Plus...the quicker they approve Roberts the quicker they can get on with the real business of the country..........picking on Rove

[Motorboat Cruiser]

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff

Plus...the quicker they approve Roberts the quicker they can get on with the real business of the country..........picking on Rove

Yeah, all he did was endanger peoples lives, probably lie to a grand jury, and destroy a career of someone's wife as payback for the supreme crime of telling the truth. Why can't people just leave the poor sap alone?

[scaeagles]

Originally Posted by Motorboat Cruiser

the supreme crime of telling the truth.

Sigh.

Guess I'll post here what I posted in the Rove thread.

Senate Select Committee On Intelligence Unanimous Report: “Conclusion 13. The Report On The Former Ambassador’s Trip To Niger, Disseminated In March 2002, Did Not Change Any Analysts’ Assessments Of The Iraq-Niger Uranium Deal.” (Senate Select Committee On Intelligence, “Report On The U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Assessments On Iraq,” 7/7/04)

[Motorboat Cruiser]

Originally Posted by scaeagles

Sigh.

Guess I'll post here what I posted in the Rove thread.

Senate Select Committee On Intelligence Unanimous Report: “Conclusion 13. The Report On The Former Ambassador’s Trip To Niger, Disseminated In March 2002, Did Not Change Any Analysts’ Assessments Of The Iraq-Niger Uranium Deal.” (Senate Select Committee On Intelligence, “Report On The U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Assessments On Iraq,” 7/7/04)

You left part of the "conclusion" out, or rather, the RNC talking points leave part of it out.

(U) Conclusion 13. The report on the former ambassador's trip to Niger, disseminated in March 2002, did not change any analysts' assessments of the Iraq-Niger uranium deal. For most analysts, the information in the report lent more credibility to the original Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) reports on the uranium deal, but State Department Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) analysts believed that the report supported their assessment that Niger was unlikely to be willing or able to sell uranium to Iraq.

The conclusion doesn't sound very conclusive to me. This quote is as cherry-picked as the data that supposedly supported the claim that Iraq saught nuclear materials from Iraq.

[Motorboat Cruiser]

However, none of the above has anything to do at all with the judicial appointment to the Supreme Court.

Way to start a hijack, Sleepyjeff!

[sleepyjeff]

Originally Posted by Motorboat Cruiser

However, none of the above has anything to do at all with the judicial appointment to the Supreme Court.

Way to start a hijack, Sleepyjeff!

lol......funny, in the Rove thread I was hijacking it away from Rove now I am hijaking it to him in this thread (ain't I a stinker?)

[scaeagles]

Way to keep those libs off balance, Sleepy!

[Motorboat Cruiser]

Originally Posted by sleepyjeff

lol......funny, in the Rove thread I was hijacking it away from Rove now I am hijaking it to him in this thread (ain't I a stinker?)

You must have learned how to change the subject from watching Scott McClellan.

[sleepyjeff]

Originally Posted by Motorboat Cruiser

You must have learned how to change the subject from watching Scott McClellan.

He was the master