![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#51 |
Kink of Swank
|
Too bad that Zodiac movie came out a month too early. It was right on point on this issue, and might not have sunk like a stone at the box office.
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
Doing The Job
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In a state
Posts: 3,956
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
On the other hand . . .the whole thing about going forward with "open eyes" is tricky. I imagine, if we had full disclosure about the collateral consequences of everything we do, we wouldn't get out of bed in the morning. Or we would because we wouldn't care about the people whose ox was being gored. Yesterday, the Supreme Court upheld Congress's criminalization of an abortion method because of how nasty it was, which it explained in excruciating detail. This was not an undue burden on abortion because other methods were available that the statute did not reach. Of course, the court detailed some of these as well, so we pretty much know how it will decide other cases that attack the method but not the right. This is the same way that challenges to execution methods are being litigated; the right to execute is not challenged, just the nasty way it's implemented. So, whether the question is abortion, capital punishment or a, for the sake of argument, just war, how much weight in the debate should the evidence that is likely to provoke the most emotional response be given?
__________________
Live now-pay later. Diner's Club! |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,852
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And, to add the ridiculous to the already deplorable, how about this headline in today's imdb updates:
NBC Weighs How To Handle Killer's Package Nope, I'm not making that one up. |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
HI!
|
LOL! Don't they have proofreaders any longer?
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Nueve
|
Oh gawd....
I'm guessing it's passe to proofread anymore. I have two textbooks with glaring grammatical errors. One text book, for my Business Communication class, stressed using proper grammar, spelling, word usage and the like... but it seems to get a C on the same count for itself. /end derail
__________________
Tomorrow is the day for you and me |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Doing The Job
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In a state
Posts: 3,956
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's a rather personal question.
(Okay, that was a stretch.)
__________________
Live now-pay later. Diner's Club! |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Nueve
|
/shakes head
__________________
Tomorrow is the day for you and me |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not that it is a big distinction but the news at IMDb is not an internal product, they synidcate WENN.
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
scribblin'
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the moment
Posts: 3,872
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wait... I'm confused. Is there a typo I'm missing?
I can understand why it's a very, very bad headline. But proofreaders are generally checking for grammar and punctuation. Copy-editors look at big questions like "gee, why are you implying that they're doing anything with the killer's genitals?" |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Kink of Swank
|
Quote:
The girthiness, however, is all nature. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |