Chastity Rings - Page 7

scaeagles · 03-15-2007, 06:44 PM

I doubt anyone who sees the ring my daughter wears would give it a second look. It's not for others, it's for her. It's just a ring. Why would this be seen as some huge outward proclamation?

I honestly do not understand why the personal standards of anyone could be offensive to others unless I am shouting from the rooftops that anyone who doesn't share my standards is abhorrent. It isn't as if my personal standards are to walk naked down the street or that it is acceptable to beat a puppy. No one is harmed, no one knows the difference.

Kevy Baby · 03-15-2007, 11:27 PM

Would it be inappropriate to wear a chastity ring in a piercing in the nether regions of one's body?

tracilicious · 03-16-2007, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevy Baby

Would it be inappropriate to wear a chastity ring in a piercing in the nether regions of one's body?

I think this would be most appropriate. See this ring? It's off limits!

innerSpaceman · 03-16-2007, 08:25 AM

Which is what I think the main purpose of a wedding ring is anyway. I don't think it's a symbol so much to the wedded couple, but a signal to everyone else ... a marking of territory, if you will .. that this person or that is unavailable - - - so keep your mitts off.

Strangler Lewis · 03-16-2007, 08:40 AM

It can be both. We know what wedding rings and engagement rings look like and the finger they are generally worn on, so, yes, they are public symbols.

We also recognize other styles of rings, jewelry, etc. that are not related to marriage. Chastity rings probably fall within this category, at least to my untrained eye. The commitment they embody to the wearer would be entirely personal and private, much like the cilice worn by the albino in The DaVinci Code.

Alex · 03-16-2007, 10:03 AM

Yes, it certainly can be both. I used to wear a ring that had a very specific symbolic meaning to me, it was publicly displayed but I was the only person in the world who knew of its significance.

I know my sense of the dividing line between public and private is overdeveloped but private symbols worn externally aren't private unless there is a similarly small circle of people who know what it means.

Even if it is unrecognized by 99% of the people, I don't know why you'd openly profess your BDSM predilection on a car bumper sticker (and once you know the sticker you see quite a few of them out there) nor why you'd openly profess that you've vowed to wait until you get married to have sex.

To me, it is not that these things are shameful, just that they are private.
It seems to me that part of our societal change over the last 40 years has been the idea that the only reason to keep something private is shame and therefore to not be ashamed requires making it public.

Bornieo: Fully Loaded · 03-16-2007, 10:16 AM

I think everyone should be required to have a sex date stamp.

"Getting some since 1976"

3894 · 03-16-2007, 10:19 AM

New LoT swag possibility?

DreadPirateRoberts · 03-16-2007, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bornieo: Fully Loaded

I think everyone should be required to have a sex date stamp.

"Getting some since 1976"

I think a McDonald's type sign would be more informative, "Over 5 million served".

LSPoorEeyorick · 03-16-2007, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex Stroup

Even if it is unrecognized by 99% of the people, I don't know why you'd openly profess your BDSM predilection on a car bumper sticker...

Hmm. I'm google-stumped.

03-15-2007, 06:44 PM	#61
scaeagles I LIKE! Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 7,819	I doubt anyone who sees the ring my daughter wears would give it a second look. It's not for others, it's for her. It's just a ring. Why would this be seen as some huge outward proclamation? I honestly do not understand why the personal standards of anyone could be offensive to others unless I am shouting from the rooftops that anyone who doesn't share my standards is abhorrent. It isn't as if my personal standards are to walk naked down the street or that it is acceptable to beat a puppy. No one is harmed, no one knows the difference.
	Submit to Quotes

03-15-2007, 11:27 PM	#62
Kevy Baby Chowder Head Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Yes Posts: 18,500	Would it be inappropriate to wear a chastity ring in a piercing in the nether regions of one's body? __________________ The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity. - Abraham Lincoln
	Submit to Quotes

03-16-2007, 08:25 AM	#64
innerSpaceman Kink of Swank Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Inner Space Posts: 13,075	Which is what I think the main purpose of a wedding ring is anyway. I don't think it's a symbol so much to the wedded couple, but a signal to everyone else ... a marking of territory, if you will .. that this person or that is unavailable - - - so keep your mitts off.
	Submit to Quotes

03-16-2007, 08:40 AM	#65
Strangler Lewis Doing The Job Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: In a state Posts: 3,956	It can be both. We know what wedding rings and engagement rings look like and the finger they are generally worn on, so, yes, they are public symbols. We also recognize other styles of rings, jewelry, etc. that are not related to marriage. Chastity rings probably fall within this category, at least to my untrained eye. The commitment they embody to the wearer would be entirely personal and private, much like the cilice worn by the albino in The DaVinci Code. __________________ Live now-pay later. Diner's Club!
	Submit to Quotes

03-16-2007, 10:03 AM	#66
Alex . Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 13,354	Yes, it certainly can be both. I used to wear a ring that had a very specific symbolic meaning to me, it was publicly displayed but I was the only person in the world who knew of its significance. I know my sense of the dividing line between public and private is overdeveloped but private symbols worn externally aren't private unless there is a similarly small circle of people who know what it means. Even if it is unrecognized by 99% of the people, I don't know why you'd openly profess your BDSM predilection on a car bumper sticker (and once you know the sticker you see quite a few of them out there) nor why you'd openly profess that you've vowed to wait until you get married to have sex. To me, it is not that these things are shameful, just that they are private. It seems to me that part of our societal change over the last 40 years has been the idea that the only reason to keep something private is shame and therefore to not be ashamed requires making it public.
	Submit to Quotes

03-16-2007, 10:16 AM	#67
Bornieo: Fully Loaded Lego Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Disneyland, USA Posts: 3,704	I think everyone should be required to have a sex date stamp. "Getting some since 1976"
	Submit to Quotes

03-16-2007, 10:19 AM	#68
3894 Next Stop: Funkytown! Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Cheeselandia Posts: 1,907	New LoT swag possibility?
	Submit to Quotes