![]() |
€uromeinke, FEJ. and Ghoulish Delight RULE!!! NA abides. |
![]() |
#61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I could accept an exception for those places that are based on tobacco use- the cigar shop that served food, or the water-pipe bars mentioned in the original article. If tobacco is the *point* of going there, it's easily avoided by those of us who choose to.
__________________
Why cycling? Anything [sport] that had to do with a ball, I wasn't very good at. -Lance Armstrong |
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Chowder Head
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yes
Posts: 18,500
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot verify their validity.
- Abraham Lincoln |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,978
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Or if the tobacco part is actually separated from the nonsmoking part, then it would be ok by me. As long as I can choose to avoid it, smoking doesn't bother me. It's only because it's so unavoidable, that it's objectionable. Maybe a geographic zoning of some kind- places here can have smoking, places here can't. As long as the zones are made small enough that people have access to both at any given point of the city, that might be ok.
__________________
Why cycling? Anything [sport] that had to do with a ball, I wasn't very good at. -Lance Armstrong |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 3,156
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I believe there's a whole different set of restrictions regarding Pacific Islanders. |
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh, I'm not saying it isn't a rational decision. That is the nature of the slippery slope. Based on the previous decisions the next one doesn't so odd any more.
|
![]() |
Submit to Quotes
![]() |